Comparison between Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD A10-6700T APU
Intel Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A10-6700T APU is manufactured by AMD.
AMD A10-6700T APU has a higher base speed of 2.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz.
AMD A10-6700T APU has a higher turbo speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.9 GHz.
AMD A10-6700T APU has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron J4025 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD A10-6700T APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while AMD A10-6700T APU uses the FM2 socket.
Intel Celeron J4025 was launched in Q1 2020, while AMD A10-6700T APU was launched in Q2 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD A10-6700T APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the AMD A10-6700T APU runs at 2.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports a turbo speed of 2.9 GHz, compared to 3.5 GHz for the AMD A10-6700T APU.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores, while the AMD A10-6700T APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A10-6700T APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090, while the AMD A10-6700T APU uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4025 was launched on Q1 2020, while the AMD A10-6700T APU was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4025 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A10-6700T APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J4025
AMD A10-6700T APU
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.0 GHz
2.5 GHz
Turbo
2.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
FM2
Launched
Q1 2020
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4025:
19%
AMD A10-6700T APU:
21%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4025
2%
AMD A10-6700T APU:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J4025: 10 watts
2.5%
AMD A10-6700T APU: 45 watts
11.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J4025 : Q1 2020 ✅
AMD A10-6700T APU : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J4025
AMD A10-6700T APU
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J4025 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD A10-6700T APU's 26.12. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A10-6700T APU's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4025 scores 1477, which is lower than the AMD A10-6700T APU's score of 2299. This makes the AMD A10-6700T APU a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD A10-6700T APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A10-6700T APU was launched more recently (Q2 2014) compared to the Intel Celeron J4025 (Q1 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A10-6700T APU has a higher base clock speed of 2.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A10-6700T APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1290, the AMD A10-6700T APU outperforms the Intel Celeron J4025 (score: 1147). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-6700T APU has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J4025's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A10-6700T APU has a higher TDP of 45W compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J4025
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A10-6700T APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J4025
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD A10-6700T APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J4025
The Intel Celeron J4025 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A10-6700T APU
The AMD A10-6700T APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
