Comparison between Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD Athlon 3000G
Intel Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon 3000G is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz.
Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher turbo speed of 2.9 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
AMD Athlon 3000G supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Celeron J4025 was launched in Q1 2020, while AMD Athlon 3000G was launched in Q4 2019.
AMD Athlon 3000G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Celeron J4025's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD Athlon 3000G are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the AMD Athlon 3000G runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports a turbo speed of 2.9 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon 3000G.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports 2 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon 3000G.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090, while the AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4025 was launched on Q1 2020, while the AMD Athlon 3000G was released on Q4 2019.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4025 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Athlon 3000G.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J4025
AMD Athlon 3000G
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.0 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
2.9 GHz
GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
AM4
Launched
Q1 2020
Q4 2019
L3 Cache
MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4025:
19%
AMD Athlon 3000G:
32%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4025
2%
AMD Athlon 3000G:
6%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J4025: 10 watts
2.5%
AMD Athlon 3000G: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J4025 : Q1 2020 ✅
AMD Athlon 3000G : Q4 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J4025
AMD Athlon 3000G
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J4025 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.9 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 49.74. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 3000G's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4025 scores 1477, which is lower than the AMD Athlon 3000G's score of 4477. This makes the AMD Athlon 3000G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Athlon 3000G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the Intel Celeron J4025 (Q1 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1979, the AMD Athlon 3000G outperforms the Intel Celeron J4025 (score: 1147). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 3000G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J4025
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon 3000G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J4025
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon 3000G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J4025
The Intel Celeron J4025 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon 3000G
The AMD Athlon 3000G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
