Home » Compare » Intel-Celeron-J4025-vs-Intel-Core-i3-10300

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i3-10300

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Core i3-10300

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i3-10300 has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz. Intel Core i3-10300 has a higher turbo speed of 4.4 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.9 GHz. Intel Core i3-10300 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2 cores. Intel Core i3-10300 supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while Intel Core i3-10300 uses the FCLGA1200 socket. Intel Celeron J4025 was launched in Q1 2020, while Intel Core i3-10300 was launched in Q2 2020. Intel Core i3-10300 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to Intel Celeron J4025's MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Core i3-10300 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-10300 runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports a turbo speed of 2.9 GHz, compared to 4.4 GHz for the Intel Core i3-10300.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores, while the Intel Core i3-10300 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports 2 threads, compared to 8 threads for the Intel Core i3-10300.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090, while the Intel Core i3-10300 uses the FCLGA1200.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4025 was launched on Q1 2020, while the Intel Core i3-10300 was released on Q2 2020.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4025 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the Intel Core i3-10300.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Celeron J4025	Intel Core i3-10300

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	2.0 GHz	3.7 GHz
Turbo	2.9 GHz	4.4 GHz
Cores	2	4
Threads	2	8
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCBGA1090	FCLGA1200
Launched	Q1 2020	Q2 2020
L3 Cache	MB	8 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Celeron J4025:

19%

Intel Core i3-10300:

44%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Celeron J4025

Intel Core i3-10300:

13%

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Celeron J4025: 10 watts

2.5%

Intel Core i3-10300: 65 watts

16.25%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Celeron J4025 : Q1 2020 ✅

Intel Core i3-10300 : Q2 2020 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Celeron J4025

Intel Core i3-10300

Pro's and Con's

Intel Celeron J4025 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i3-10300's 58.52. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10300's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10300's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4025 scores 1477, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-10300's score of 9305. This makes the Intel Core i3-10300 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Intel Core i3-10300 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-10300 was launched more recently (Q2 2020) compared to the Intel Celeron J4025 (Q1 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-10300 has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i3-10300 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.4 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2691, the Intel Core i3-10300 outperforms the Intel Celeron J4025 (score: 1147). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10300 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-10300 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Productivity

Intel Celeron J4025
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Core i3-10300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Celeron J4025
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Core i3-10300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict