Comparison between Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Core i3-7300T
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-7300T has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz.
Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher turbo speed of 2.9 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-7300T's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Intel Core i3-7300T supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while Intel Core i3-7300T uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
Intel Celeron J4025 was launched in Q1 2020, while Intel Core i3-7300T was launched in Q2 2017.
Intel Core i3-7300T has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Celeron J4025's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Core i3-7300T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-7300T runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports a turbo speed of 2.9 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-7300T.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores, while the Intel Core i3-7300T has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports 2 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-7300T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090, while the Intel Core i3-7300T uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4025 was launched on Q1 2020, while the Intel Core i3-7300T was released on Q2 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4025 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Core i3-7300T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J4025
Intel Core i3-7300T
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
2.0 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
2.9 GHz
GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q1 2020
Q2 2017
L3 Cache
MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4025:
19%
Intel Core i3-7300T:
35%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4025
2%
Intel Core i3-7300T:
6%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J4025: 10 watts
2.5%
Intel Core i3-7300T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J4025 : Q1 2020 ✅
Intel Core i3-7300T : Q2 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J4025
Intel Core i3-7300T
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J4025 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.9 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-7300T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i3-7300T's 32.65. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-7300T's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4025 scores 1477, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-7300T's score of 4211. This makes the Intel Core i3-7300T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Intel Core i3-7300T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-7300T was launched more recently (Q2 2017) compared to the Intel Celeron J4025 (Q1 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-7300T has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2136, the Intel Core i3-7300T outperforms the Intel Celeron J4025 (score: 1147). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-7300T features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-7300T has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J4025
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-7300T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J4025
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-7300T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J4025
The Intel Celeron J4025 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-7300T
The Intel Core i3-7300T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
