Comparison between Intel Celeron J4105 and AMD A6-9230
Intel Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A6-9230 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD A6-9230 has a higher base speed of 2.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4105's 1.5 GHz.
AMD A6-9230 has a higher turbo speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4105's 2.5 GHz.
Intel Celeron J4105 has more cores (4) compared to AMD A6-9230's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron J4105 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD A6-9230's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while AMD A6-9230 uses the socket.
Intel Celeron J4105 was launched in Q1 2018, while AMD A6-9230 was launched in Q3 2017.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J4105 and AMD A6-9230 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4105 has a base speed of 1.5 GHz, while the AMD A6-9230 runs at 2.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4105 supports a turbo speed of 2.5 GHz, compared to 3.5 GHz for the AMD A6-9230.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4105 has 4 cores, while the AMD A6-9230 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4105 supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A6-9230.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090, while the AMD A6-9230 uses the .
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4105 was launched on Q1 2018, while the AMD A6-9230 was released on Q3 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4105 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A6-9230.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J4105
AMD A6-9230
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
1.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Turbo
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
Launched
Q1 2018
Q3 2017
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4105:
18%
AMD A6-9230:
18%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4105
4%
AMD A6-9230:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J4105: 10 watts
2.5%
AMD A6-9230: 15 watts
3.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J4105 : Q1 2018 ✅
AMD A6-9230 : Q3 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J4105
AMD A6-9230
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J4105 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Not available
AMD A6-9230 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A6-9230 was launched more recently (Q3 2017) compared to the Intel Celeron J4105 (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A6-9230 has a higher base clock speed of 2.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A6-9230 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 2.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1124, the AMD A6-9230 outperforms the Intel Celeron J4105 (score: 1091). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A6-9230 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 27.10. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD A6-9230 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J4105's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD A6-9230 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J4105's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A6-9230 scores 1303, which is lower than the Intel Celeron J4105's score of 2900. This makes the Intel Celeron J4105 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A6-9230 has a higher TDP of 15W compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J4105
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A6-9230
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J4105
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD A6-9230
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J4105
The Intel Celeron J4105 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A6-9230
The AMD A6-9230 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
