Comparison between Intel Celeron J4105 and AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Intel Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD FX-670K Quad-Core is manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4105's 1.5 GHz.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher turbo speed of 4.3 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4105's 2.5 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Intel Celeron J4105 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while AMD FX-670K Quad-Core uses the FM2 socket.
Intel Celeron J4105 was launched in Q1 2018, while AMD FX-670K Quad-Core was launched in Q2 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J4105 and AMD FX-670K Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4105 has a base speed of 1.5 GHz, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4105 supports a turbo speed of 2.5 GHz, compared to 4.3 GHz for the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4105 has 4 cores, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4105 supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4105 was launched on Q1 2018, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4105 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J4105
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
1.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
2.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
FM2
Launched
Q1 2018
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4105:
18%
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4105
4%
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J4105: 10 watts
2.5%
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J4105 : Q1 2018 ✅
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J4105
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J4105 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4105 scores 2900, which is lower than the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's score of 2980. This makes the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core was launched more recently (Q2 2014) compared to the Intel Celeron J4105 (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 2.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1578, the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core outperforms the Intel Celeron J4105 (score: 1091). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 27.10. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J4105's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J4105
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J4105
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J4105
The Intel Celeron J4105 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
