Comparison between Intel Celeron J4105 and AMD PRO A6-9500E
Intel Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD PRO A6-9500E is manufactured by AMD.
AMD PRO A6-9500E has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4105's 1.5 GHz.
AMD PRO A6-9500E has a higher turbo speed of 3.4 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4105's 2.5 GHz.
Intel Celeron J4105 has more cores (4) compared to AMD PRO A6-9500E's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron J4105 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD PRO A6-9500E's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while AMD PRO A6-9500E uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Celeron J4105 was launched in Q1 2018, while AMD PRO A6-9500E was launched in Q1 2017.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J4105 and AMD PRO A6-9500E are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4105 has a base speed of 1.5 GHz, while the AMD PRO A6-9500E runs at 3.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4105 supports a turbo speed of 2.5 GHz, compared to 3.4 GHz for the AMD PRO A6-9500E.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4105 has 4 cores, while the AMD PRO A6-9500E has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4105 supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD PRO A6-9500E.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090, while the AMD PRO A6-9500E uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4105 was launched on Q1 2018, while the AMD PRO A6-9500E was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4105 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD PRO A6-9500E.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J4105
AMD PRO A6-9500E
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
1.5 GHz
3.0 GHz
Turbo
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
AM4
Launched
Q1 2018
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4105:
18%
AMD PRO A6-9500E:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4105
4%
AMD PRO A6-9500E:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J4105: 10 watts
2.5%
AMD PRO A6-9500E: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J4105 : Q1 2018 ✅
AMD PRO A6-9500E : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J4105
AMD PRO A6-9500E
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J4105 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron J4105 was launched more recently (Q1 2018) compared to the AMD PRO A6-9500E (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J4105 has a higher CPU Mark score of 27.10 compared to the AMD PRO A6-9500E's 22.46. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
AMD PRO A6-9500E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A6-9500E has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A6-9500E supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 2.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1493, the AMD PRO A6-9500E outperforms the Intel Celeron J4105 (score: 1091). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD PRO A6-9500E has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J4105's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A6-9500E has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J4105's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD PRO A6-9500E scores 1662, which is lower than the Intel Celeron J4105's score of 2900. This makes the Intel Celeron J4105 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD PRO A6-9500E has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J4105
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD PRO A6-9500E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J4105
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD PRO A6-9500E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J4105
The Intel Celeron J4105 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD PRO A6-9500E
The AMD PRO A6-9500E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
