Comparison between Intel Celeron J4115 and AMD Athlon X4 840
Intel Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon X4 840 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher base speed of 3.1 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4115's 1.8 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4115's 2.5 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Intel Celeron J4115 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD Athlon X4 840's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J4115 uses the socket, while AMD Athlon X4 840 uses the FM2+ socket.
Intel Celeron J4115 was launched in Q1 2020, while AMD Athlon X4 840 was launched in Q1 2015.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J4115 and AMD Athlon X4 840 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4115 has a base speed of 1.8 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 runs at 3.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4115 supports a turbo speed of 2.5 GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4115 has 4 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4115 supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4115 uses the , while the AMD Athlon X4 840 uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4115 was launched on Q1 2020, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 was released on Q1 2015.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4115 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J4115
AMD Athlon X4 840
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Turbo
2.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2+
Launched
Q1 2020
Q1 2015
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4115:
17%
AMD Athlon X4 840:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4115
3%
AMD Athlon X4 840:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J4115: watts
0%
AMD Athlon X4 840: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J4115 : Q1 2020 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 840 : Q1 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J4115
AMD Athlon X4 840
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J4115 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron J4115 was launched more recently (Q1 2020) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840 (Q1 2015). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J4115 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840's 26.55. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4115 scores 2692, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 840's score of 3318. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 840 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Athlon X4 840 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher base clock speed of 3.1 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4115's 1.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 840 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4115's 2.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1488, the AMD Athlon X4 840 outperforms the Intel Celeron J4115 (score: 1067). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 840 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J4115's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J4115's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J4115
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 840
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J4115
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 840
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J4115
The Intel Celeron J4115 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 840
The AMD Athlon X4 840 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
