Home » Compare » Intel-Celeron-J4125-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-3600

Intel Celeron J4125 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Celeron J4125 and AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Celeron J4125 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4125's 2.0 GHz. AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4125's 2.7 GHz. AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has more cores (6) compared to Intel Celeron J4125's 4 cores. AMD Ryzen 5 3600 supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Celeron J4125's 4 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Celeron J4125 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket. Intel Celeron J4125 was launched in Q1 2020, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was launched in Q2 2019. AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to Intel Celeron J4125's MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Celeron J4125 and AMD Ryzen 5 3600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4125 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4125 supports a turbo speed of 2.7 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 3600.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4125 has 4 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has 6 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4125 supports 4 threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 3600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4125 uses the FCBGA1090, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4125 was launched on Q1 2020, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was released on Q2 2019.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4125 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 32 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 3600.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Celeron J4125	AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Manufacturer	Intel	AMD
Speed	2.0 GHz	3.6 GHz
Turbo	2.7 GHz	4.2 GHz
Cores	4	6
Threads	4	12
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCBGA1090	AM4
Launched	Q1 2020	Q2 2019
L3 Cache	MB	32 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Celeron J4125:

19%

AMD Ryzen 5 3600:

42%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Celeron J4125

AMD Ryzen 5 3600:

25%

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Celeron J4125: 10 watts

2.5%

AMD Ryzen 5 3600: 65 watts

16.25%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Celeron J4125 : Q1 2020 ✅

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 : Q2 2019 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Celeron J4125

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Pro's and Con's

Intel Celeron J4125 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J4125 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 3600's 188.74. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J4125 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 3600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J4125 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 3600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4125 scores 2956, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 3600's score of 17740. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was launched more recently (Q2 2019) compared to the Intel Celeron J4125 (Q1 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4125's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4125's 2.7 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2566, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the Intel Celeron J4125 (score: 1161). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the Intel Celeron J4125's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J4125's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Productivity

Intel Celeron J4125
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Ryzen 5 3600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Celeron J4125
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.

Verdict