Comparison between Intel Celeron N5095 and AMD FirePro A320 APU
Intel Celeron N5095 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD FirePro A320 APU is manufactured by AMD.
AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron N5095's 2.0 GHz.
AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron N5095's 2.9 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Intel Celeron N5095 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron N5095 uses the FCBGA1338 socket, while AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2 socket.
Intel Celeron N5095 was launched in Q3 2021, while AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched in Q3 2016.
Intel Celeron N5095 has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron N5095 and AMD FirePro A320 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU runs at 3.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron N5095 supports a turbo speed of 2.9 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Cores: The Intel Celeron N5095 has 4 cores, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron N5095 supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron N5095 uses the FCBGA1338, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron N5095 was launched on Q3 2021, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU was released on Q3 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron N5095 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron N5095
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.0 GHz
3.8 GHz
Turbo
2.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1338
FM2
Launched
Q3 2021
Q3 2016
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron N5095:
25%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron N5095
5%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron N5095: 15 watts
3.75%
AMD FirePro A320 APU: 100 watts
25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron N5095 : Q3 2021 ✅
AMD FirePro A320 APU : Q3 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron N5095
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron N5095 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron N5095 was launched more recently (Q3 2021) compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU (Q3 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1502, the Intel Celeron N5095 outperforms the AMD FirePro A320 APU (score: 1193). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron N5095 features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD FirePro A320 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron N5095's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FirePro A320 APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron N5095's 2.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron N5095's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FirePro A320 APU scores 2153, which is lower than the Intel Celeron N5095's score of 4075. This makes the Intel Celeron N5095 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher TDP of 100W compared to the Intel Celeron N5095's 15W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron N5095
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron N5095
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron N5095
The Intel Celeron N5095 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
The AMD FirePro A320 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
