Comparison between Intel Celeron N5095A and Intel Atom E3845
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Celeron N5095A has a higher base speed of 2.0 GHz compared to Intel Atom E3845's 1.9 GHz.
Intel Celeron N5095A has a higher turbo speed of 2.9 GHz compared to Intel Atom E3845's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron N5095A uses the FCBGA1338 socket, while Intel Atom E3845 uses the FCBGA1170 socket.
Intel Celeron N5095A was launched in Q1 2022, while Intel Atom E3845 was launched in Q2 2014.
Intel Celeron N5095A has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Atom E3845's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron N5095A and Intel Atom E3845 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095A has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the Intel Atom E3845 runs at 1.9 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron N5095A supports a turbo speed of 2.9 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Atom E3845.
Cores: The Intel Celeron N5095A has 4 cores, while the Intel Atom E3845 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron N5095A supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Atom E3845.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron N5095A uses the FCBGA1338, while the Intel Atom E3845 uses the FCBGA1170.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron N5095A was launched on Q1 2022, while the Intel Atom E3845 was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron N5095A has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Atom E3845.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron N5095A
Intel Atom E3845
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
2.0 GHz
1.9 GHz
Turbo
2.9 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1338
FCBGA1170
Launched
Q1 2022
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron N5095A:
25%
Intel Atom E3845:
8%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron N5095A
5%
Intel Atom E3845:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron N5095A: 15 watts
3.75%
Intel Atom E3845: 10 watts
2.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron N5095A : Q1 2022 ✅
Intel Atom E3845 : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron N5095A
Intel Atom E3845
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron N5095A – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095A has a higher base clock speed of 2.0 GHz compared to the Intel Atom E3845's 1.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095A supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.9 GHz compared to the Intel Atom E3845's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1513, the Intel Celeron N5095A outperforms the Intel Atom E3845 (score: 536). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron N5095A features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Atom E3845's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron N5095A has a higher TDP of 15W compared to the Intel Atom E3845's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Atom E3845 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Atom E3845 was launched more recently (Q2 2014) compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A (Q1 2022). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Atom E3845 scores 1065, which is lower than the Intel Celeron N5095A's score of 4110. This makes the Intel Celeron N5095A a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Celeron N5095A
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Atom E3845
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron N5095A
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Atom E3845
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron N5095A
The Intel Celeron N5095A is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Atom E3845
The Intel Atom E3845 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
