🚀 CPU Launch

Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Celeron G6900

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel Celeron N5095A and Intel Celeron G6900

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Celeron G6900 has a higher base speed of 3.4 GHz compared to Intel Celeron N5095A's 2.0 GHz. Intel Celeron N5095A has a higher turbo speed of 2.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G6900's GHz. Intel Celeron N5095A has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 2 cores. Intel Celeron N5095A supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Celeron N5095A uses the FCBGA1338 socket, while Intel Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700,BGA1700 socket. Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q1 2022. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 4 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Celeron N5095A and Intel Celeron G6900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095A has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G6900 runs at 3.4 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron N5095A supports a turbo speed of 2.9 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G6900.
  • Cores: The Intel Celeron N5095A has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel Celeron N5095A supports 4 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G6900.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel Celeron N5095A uses the FCBGA1338, while the Intel Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700,BGA1700.
  • Launch Date: The Intel Celeron N5095A was launched on Q1 2022, while the Intel Celeron G6900 was released on Q1 2022.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron N5095A has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Celeron G6900.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel Celeron N5095A Intel Celeron G6900
Intel Intel
Manufacturer Intel Intel
Speed 2.0 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo 2.9 GHz GHz
Cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FCBGA1338 LGA1700,BGA1700
Launched Q1 2022 Q1 2022
L3 Cache 4 MB 4 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Celeron N5095A:



25%
Intel Celeron G6900:
45%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Celeron N5095A



5%
Intel Celeron G6900:
6%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Celeron N5095A: 15 watts



3.75%
Intel Celeron G6900: 46 watts
11.5%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel Celeron N5095A : Q1 2022 ✅

Intel Celeron G6900 : Q1 2022 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Celeron N5095A



Intel Celeron G6900


Pro's and Con's

Intel Celeron N5095A – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095A supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron N5095A has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's 101.15. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron N5095A scores 4110, which is lower than the Intel Celeron G6900's score of 4551. This makes the Intel Celeron G6900 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Intel Celeron G6900 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G6900 has a higher base clock speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2727, the Intel Celeron G6900 outperforms the Intel Celeron N5095A (score: 1513). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron N5095A's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron N5095A's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G6900 has a higher TDP of 46W compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A's 15W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


Intel Celeron N5095A
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron G6900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel Celeron N5095A
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron G6900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel Celeron N5095A

The Intel Celeron N5095A is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Celeron G6900

The Intel Celeron G6900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.