Comparison between Intel Celeron N5095A and Intel Core i3-4370
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-4370 has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron N5095A's 2.0 GHz.
Intel Celeron N5095A has a higher turbo speed of 2.9 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4370's GHz.
Intel Celeron N5095A has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i3-4370's 2 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron N5095A uses the FCBGA1338 socket, while Intel Core i3-4370 uses the LGA1150 socket.
Intel Celeron N5095A was launched in Q1 2022, while Intel Core i3-4370 was launched in Q3 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron N5095A and Intel Core i3-4370 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095A has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-4370 runs at 3.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron N5095A supports a turbo speed of 2.9 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-4370.
Cores: The Intel Celeron N5095A has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i3-4370 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron N5095A supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-4370.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron N5095A uses the FCBGA1338, while the Intel Core i3-4370 uses the LGA1150.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron N5095A was launched on Q1 2022, while the Intel Core i3-4370 was released on Q3 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron N5095A has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Core i3-4370.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron N5095A
Intel Core i3-4370
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
2.0 GHz
3.8 GHz
Turbo
2.9 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1338
LGA1150
Launched
Q1 2022
Q3 2014
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron N5095A:
25%
Intel Core i3-4370:
36%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron N5095A
5%
Intel Core i3-4370:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron N5095A: 15 watts
3.75%
Intel Core i3-4370: 54 watts
13.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron N5095A : Q1 2022 ✅
Intel Core i3-4370 : Q3 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron N5095A
Intel Core i3-4370
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron N5095A – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095A supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.9 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4370's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron N5095A has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i3-4370's 94.01. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
Intel Core i3-4370 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-4370 was launched more recently (Q3 2014) compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A (Q1 2022). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-4370 has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2161, the Intel Core i3-4370 outperforms the Intel Celeron N5095A (score: 1513). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-4370 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron N5095A's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-4370 scores 3867, which is lower than the Intel Celeron N5095A's score of 4110. This makes the Intel Celeron N5095A a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-4370 has a higher TDP of 54W compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A's 15W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron N5095A
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-4370
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron N5095A
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-4370
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron N5095A
The Intel Celeron N5095A is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-4370
The Intel Core i3-4370 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
