Comparison between Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and Intel Core i9-13900F
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Intel Core i9-13900F has more cores (24) compared to Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF's 14 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the FCLGA1851 socket, while Intel Core i9-13900F uses the FCLGA1700 socket.
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF was launched in Q4 2024, while Intel Core i9-13900F was launched in Q1 2023.
Intel Core i9-13900F has a larger L3 cache of 36 MB compared to Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF's 24 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF and Intel Core i9-13900F are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has a base speed of GHz, while the Intel Core i9-13900F runs at GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i9-13900F.
Cores: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has 14 cores, while the Intel Core i9-13900F has 24 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF supports threads, compared to threads for the Intel Core i9-13900F.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the FCLGA1851, while the Intel Core i9-13900F uses the FCLGA1700.
Launch Date: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF was launched on Q4 2024, while the Intel Core i9-13900F was released on Q1 2023.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has 24 MB of L3 cache, compared to 36 MB for the Intel Core i9-13900F.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Intel Core i9-13900F
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
GHz
GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
14
24
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1851
FCLGA1700
Launched
Q4 2024
Q1 2023
L3 Cache
24 MB
36 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF:
79%
Intel Core i9-13900F:
73%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
63%
Intel Core i9-13900F:
73%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF: 125 watts
31.25%
Intel Core i9-13900F: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF : Q4 2024 ✅
Intel Core i9-13900F : Q1 2023 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Intel Core i9-13900F
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF was launched more recently (Q4 2024) compared to the Intel Core i9-13900F (Q1 2023). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 4761, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF outperforms the Intel Core i9-13900F (score: 4417). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has a higher CPU Mark score of 162.87 compared to the Intel Core i9-13900F's 130.03. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has 14 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-13900F's 24 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF scores 43973, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-13900F's score of 50712. This makes the Intel Core i9-13900F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the Intel Core i9-13900F's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i9-13900F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-13900F features a larger L3 cache of 36MB compared to the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF's 24MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
Productivity
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i9-13900F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Core i9-13900F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i9-13900F
The Intel Core i9-13900F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
