Comparison between Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and AMD A8-9600
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD A8-9600 has a higher base speed of 3.1 GHz compared to Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's GHz.
AMD A8-9600 has a higher turbo speed of 3.4 GHz compared to Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's GHz.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has more cores (20) compared to AMD A8-9600's 4 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses the FCLGA1851 socket, while AMD A8-9600 uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K was launched in Q4 2024, while AMD A8-9600 was launched in Q2 2017.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a larger L3 cache of 30 MB compared to AMD A8-9600's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and AMD A8-9600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a base speed of GHz, while the AMD A8-9600 runs at 3.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.4 GHz for the AMD A8-9600.
Cores: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has 20 cores, while the AMD A8-9600 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD A8-9600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses the FCLGA1851, while the AMD A8-9600 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K was launched on Q4 2024, while the AMD A8-9600 was released on Q2 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has 30 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A8-9600.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
AMD A8-9600
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
GHz
3.1 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.4 GHz
Cores
20
4
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1851
AM4
Launched
Q4 2024
Q2 2017
L3 Cache
30 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K:
80%
AMD A8-9600:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
85%
AMD A8-9600:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K: 125 watts
31.25%
AMD A8-9600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K : Q4 2024 ✅
AMD A8-9600 : Q2 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
AMD A8-9600
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K was launched more recently (Q4 2024) compared to the AMD A8-9600 (Q2 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 4804, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms the AMD A8-9600 (score: 1490). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K features a larger L3 cache of 30MB compared to the AMD A8-9600's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a higher CPU Mark score of 155.10 compared to the AMD A8-9600's 29.46. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the AMD A8-9600's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD A8-9600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A8-9600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.1 GHz compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A8-9600 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD A8-9600 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's 20 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A8-9600 scores 3314, which is lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's score of 58937. This makes the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A8-9600
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD A8-9600
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A8-9600
The AMD A8-9600 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
