Comparison between Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and AMD Athlon 3000G
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon 3000G is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has more cores (20) compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 2 cores.
AMD Athlon 3000G supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses the FCLGA1851 socket, while AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K was launched in Q4 2024, while AMD Athlon 3000G was launched in Q4 2019.
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a larger L3 cache of 30 MB compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and AMD Athlon 3000G are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a base speed of GHz, while the AMD Athlon 3000G runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon 3000G.
Cores: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has 20 cores, while the AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon 3000G.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses the FCLGA1851, while the AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K was launched on Q4 2024, while the AMD Athlon 3000G was released on Q4 2019.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has 30 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Athlon 3000G.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
AMD Athlon 3000G
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
20
2
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1851
AM4
Launched
Q4 2024
Q4 2019
L3 Cache
30 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K:
80%
AMD Athlon 3000G:
32%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
85%
AMD Athlon 3000G:
6%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K: 125 watts
31.25%
AMD Athlon 3000G: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K : Q4 2024 ✅
AMD Athlon 3000G : Q4 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
AMD Athlon 3000G
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K was launched more recently (Q4 2024) compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G (Q4 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 4804, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms the AMD Athlon 3000G (score: 1979). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K features a larger L3 cache of 30MB compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a higher CPU Mark score of 155.10 compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 49.74. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 3000G's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Athlon 3000G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's 20 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon 3000G scores 4477, which is lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K's score of 58937. This makes the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon 3000G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Athlon 3000G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon 3000G
The AMD Athlon 3000G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
