Comparison between Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and AMD Athlon X4 530
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon X4 530 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon X4 530 has a higher base speed of 2.0 GHz compared to Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has more cores (24) compared to AMD Athlon X4 530's 4 cores.
AMD Athlon X4 530 supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the FCLGA1851 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 530 uses the AM1 socket.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K was launched in Q4 2024, while AMD Athlon X4 530 was launched in Q1 2021.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a larger L3 cache of 36 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 530's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and AMD Athlon X4 530 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base speed of GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 530 runs at 2.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 530.
Cores: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 24 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 530 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon X4 530.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the FCLGA1851, while the AMD Athlon X4 530 uses the AM1.
Launch Date: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K was launched on Q4 2024, while the AMD Athlon X4 530 was released on Q1 2021.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 36 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 530.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
AMD Athlon X4 530
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
GHz
2.0 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
24
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1851
AM1
Launched
Q4 2024
Q1 2021
L3 Cache
36 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K:
84%
AMD Athlon X4 530:
11%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
98%
AMD Athlon X4 530:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 125 watts
31.25%
AMD Athlon X4 530: 25 watts
6.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K : Q4 2024 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 530 : Q1 2021 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
AMD Athlon X4 530
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K was launched more recently (Q4 2024) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 530 (Q1 2021). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 5084, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 530 (score: 690). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K features a larger L3 cache of 36MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 530's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 530's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the AMD Athlon X4 530's 25W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Athlon X4 530 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has a higher base clock speed of 2.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's 86.65. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 530 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's 24 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 530 scores 1786, which is lower than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's score of 68271. This makes the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 530
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 530
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 530
The AMD Athlon X4 530 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
