Comparison between Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and AMD Athlon X4 880K
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon X4 880K is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's GHz.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has more cores (24) compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's 4 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the FCLGA1851 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+ socket.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K was launched in Q4 2024, while AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched in Q2 2016.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a larger L3 cache of 36 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and AMD Athlon X4 880K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a base speed of GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K runs at 4.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
Cores: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 24 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses the FCLGA1851, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K was launched on Q4 2024, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K was released on Q2 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has 36 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
GHz
4.0 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
24
4
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1851
FM2+
Launched
Q4 2024
Q2 2016
L3 Cache
36 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K:
84%
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
27%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
98%
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 125 watts
31.25%
AMD Athlon X4 880K: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K : Q4 2024 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 880K : Q2 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K was launched more recently (Q4 2024) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 5084, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 880K (score: 1633). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K features a larger L3 cache of 36MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a higher CPU Mark score of 86.65 compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 38.71. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 95W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Athlon X4 880K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's 24 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 880K scores 3663, which is lower than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's score of 68271. This makes the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 880K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 880K
The AMD Athlon X4 880K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
