Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i3-10100F-vs-Intel-Celeron-G470

Intel Core i3-10100F vs Intel Celeron G470

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i3-10100F and Intel Celeron G470

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i3-10100F has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G470's 2.0 GHz. Intel Core i3-10100F has a higher turbo speed of 4.3 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G470's GHz. Intel Core i3-10100F has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G470's 1 cores. Intel Core i3-10100F supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Celeron G470's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i3-10100F uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while Intel Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155 socket. Intel Core i3-10100F was launched in Q4 2020, while Intel Celeron G470 was launched in Q1 2014. Intel Core i3-10100F has a larger L3 cache of 6 MB compared to Intel Celeron G470's 0 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i3-10100F and Intel Celeron G470 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-10100F has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G470 runs at 2.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-10100F supports a turbo speed of 4.3 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G470.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-10100F has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G470 has 1 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-10100F supports 8 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G470.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-10100F uses the FCLGA1200, while the Intel Celeron G470 uses the LGA1155.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-10100F was launched on Q4 2020, while the Intel Celeron G470 was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10100F has 6 MB of L3 cache, compared to 0 MB for the Intel Celeron G470.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i3-10100F	Intel Celeron G470

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	3.6 GHz	2.0 GHz
Turbo	4.3 GHz	GHz
Cores	4	1
Threads	8	2
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA1200	LGA1155
Launched	Q4 2020	Q1 2014
L3 Cache	6 MB	0 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i3-10100F:

43%

Intel Celeron G470:

13%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i3-10100F

12%

Intel Celeron G470:

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i3-10100F: 65 watts

16.25%

Intel Celeron G470: 35 watts

8.75%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i3-10100F : Q4 2020 ✅

Intel Celeron G470 : Q1 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i3-10100F

Intel Celeron G470

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i3-10100F – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-10100F was launched more recently (Q4 2020) compared to the Intel Celeron G470 (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-10100F has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G470's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i3-10100F supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G470's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2591, the Intel Core i3-10100F outperforms the Intel Celeron G470 (score: 837). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10100F features a larger L3 cache of 6MB compared to the Intel Celeron G470's 0MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-10100F has a higher CPU Mark score of 116.62 compared to the Intel Celeron G470's 16.20. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-10100F has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G470's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Celeron G470 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Not available

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G470 has 1 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10100F's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G470 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10100F's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G470 scores 570, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-10100F's score of 8747. This makes the Intel Core i3-10100F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

Intel Core i3-10100F
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron G470
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i3-10100F
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron G470
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict