🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i3-10105-vs-AMD-A9-9820

Intel Core i3-10105 vs AMD A9-9820

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i3-10105 and AMD A9-9820

Intel Core i3-10105 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A9-9820 is manufactured by AMD. Intel Core i3-10105 has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to AMD A9-9820's 2.3 GHz. Intel Core i3-10105 has a higher turbo speed of 4.4 GHz compared to AMD A9-9820's 2.4 GHz. AMD A9-9820 has more cores (8) compared to Intel Core i3-10105's 4 cores. Both CPUs support the same number of threads (8).

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i3-10105 uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while AMD A9-9820 uses the socket. Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q2 2021. Intel Core i3-10105 has a larger L3 cache of 6 MB compared to AMD A9-9820's MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i3-10105 and AMD A9-9820 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel Core i3-10105 has a base speed of 3.7 GHz, while the AMD A9-9820 runs at 2.3 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-10105 supports a turbo speed of 4.4 GHz, compared to 2.4 GHz for the AMD A9-9820.
  • Cores: The Intel Core i3-10105 has 4 cores, while the AMD A9-9820 has 8 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel Core i3-10105 supports 8 threads, compared to 8 threads for the AMD A9-9820.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel Core i3-10105 uses the FCLGA1200, while the AMD A9-9820 uses the .
  • Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-10105 was launched on Q2 2021, while the AMD A9-9820 was released on Q2 2021.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10105 has 6 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A9-9820.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel Core i3-10105 AMD A9-9820
Intel AMD
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Speed 3.7 GHz 2.3 GHz
Turbo 4.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores 4 8
Threads 8 8
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FCLGA1200
Launched Q2 2021 Q2 2021
L3 Cache 6 MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i3-10105:



44%
AMD A9-9820:
13%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i3-10105



12%
AMD A9-9820:
5%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i3-10105: 65 watts



16.25%
AMD A9-9820: watts
0%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel Core i3-10105 : Q2 2021 ✅

AMD A9-9820 : Q2 2021 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i3-10105



AMD A9-9820


Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i3-10105 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-10105 has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9820's 2.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i3-10105 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.4 GHz compared to the AMD A9-9820's 2.4 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2675, the Intel Core i3-10105 outperforms the AMD A9-9820 (score: 800). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10105 features a larger L3 cache of 6MB compared to the AMD A9-9820's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-10105 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A9-9820's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-10105 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the AMD A9-9820's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

AMD A9-9820 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A9-9820 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i3-10105's 100.61. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A9-9820 scores 3938, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-10105's score of 8547. This makes the Intel Core i3-10105 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


Intel Core i3-10105
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD A9-9820
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel Core i3-10105
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD A9-9820
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel Core i3-10105

The Intel Core i3-10105 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD A9-9820

The AMD A9-9820 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.