Comparison between Intel Core i3-10305T and Intel Core i3-9100F
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-9100F has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-10305T's 3.0 GHz.
Intel Core i3-9100F has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-10305T's 4.0 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Intel Core i3-10305T supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Core i3-9100F's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i3-10305T uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while Intel Core i3-9100F uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket.
Intel Core i3-10305T was launched in Q2 2021, while Intel Core i3-9100F was launched in Q2 2019.
Intel Core i3-10305T has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to Intel Core i3-9100F's 6 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i3-10305T and Intel Core i3-9100F are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-10305T has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-9100F runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-10305T supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the Intel Core i3-9100F.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-10305T has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i3-9100F has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-10305T supports 8 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-9100F.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-10305T uses the FCLGA1200, while the Intel Core i3-9100F uses the FCLGA1151-2.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-10305T was launched on Q2 2021, while the Intel Core i3-9100F was released on Q2 2019.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10305T has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to 6 MB for the Intel Core i3-9100F.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i3-10305T
Intel Core i3-9100F
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
3.0 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
4.0 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
8
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1200
FCLGA1151-2
Launched
Q2 2021
Q2 2019
L3 Cache
8 MB
6 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-10305T:
40%
Intel Core i3-9100F:
41%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-10305T
11%
Intel Core i3-9100F:
9%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i3-10305T: 35 watts
8.75%
Intel Core i3-9100F: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i3-10305T : Q2 2021 ✅
Intel Core i3-9100F : Q2 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i3-10305T
Intel Core i3-9100F
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i3-10305T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-10305T was launched more recently (Q2 2021) compared to the Intel Core i3-9100F (Q2 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10305T features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the Intel Core i3-9100F's 6MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
Intel Core i3-9100F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-9100F has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-10305T's 3.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i3-9100F supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-10305T's 4.0 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2497, the Intel Core i3-9100F outperforms the Intel Core i3-10305T (score: 2457). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-9100F has a higher CPU Mark score of 134.74 compared to the Intel Core i3-10305T's 56.90. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-9100F has 4 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10305T's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-9100F scores 6736, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-10305T's score of 8136. This makes the Intel Core i3-10305T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-9100F has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-10305T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Core i3-10305T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-9100F
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i3-10305T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-9100F
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i3-10305T
The Intel Core i3-10305T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-9100F
The Intel Core i3-9100F is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
