Comparison between Intel Core i3-10305T and Intel Pentium G3450T
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-10305T has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to Intel Pentium G3450T's 2.9 GHz.
Intel Core i3-10305T has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Pentium G3450T's GHz.
Intel Core i3-10305T has more cores (4) compared to Intel Pentium G3450T's 2 cores.
Intel Core i3-10305T supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Pentium G3450T's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i3-10305T uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while Intel Pentium G3450T uses the LGA1150 socket.
Intel Core i3-10305T was launched in Q2 2021, while Intel Pentium G3450T was launched in Q4 2015.
Intel Core i3-10305T has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to Intel Pentium G3450T's 3 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i3-10305T and Intel Pentium G3450T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-10305T has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the Intel Pentium G3450T runs at 2.9 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-10305T supports a turbo speed of 4.0 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Pentium G3450T.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-10305T has 4 cores, while the Intel Pentium G3450T has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-10305T supports 8 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Pentium G3450T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-10305T uses the FCLGA1200, while the Intel Pentium G3450T uses the LGA1150.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-10305T was launched on Q2 2021, while the Intel Pentium G3450T was released on Q4 2015.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10305T has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Pentium G3450T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i3-10305T
Intel Pentium G3450T
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
3.0 GHz
2.9 GHz
Turbo
4.0 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
8
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1200
LGA1150
Launched
Q2 2021
Q4 2015
L3 Cache
8 MB
3 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-10305T:
40%
Intel Pentium G3450T:
18%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-10305T
11%
Intel Pentium G3450T:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i3-10305T: 35 watts
8.75%
Intel Pentium G3450T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i3-10305T : Q2 2021 ✅
Intel Pentium G3450T : Q4 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i3-10305T
Intel Pentium G3450T
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i3-10305T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-10305T has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the Intel Pentium G3450T's 2.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i3-10305T supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Pentium G3450T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2457, the Intel Core i3-10305T outperforms the Intel Pentium G3450T (score: 1135). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10305T features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the Intel Pentium G3450T's 3MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
Intel Pentium G3450T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Pentium G3450T was launched more recently (Q4 2015) compared to the Intel Core i3-10305T (Q2 2021). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Pentium G3450T has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i3-10305T's 56.90. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Pentium G3450T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10305T's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Pentium G3450T has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10305T's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Pentium G3450T scores 2016, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-10305T's score of 8136. This makes the Intel Core i3-10305T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i3-10305T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Pentium G3450T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i3-10305T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Pentium G3450T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i3-10305T
The Intel Core i3-10305T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Pentium G3450T
The Intel Pentium G3450T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
