Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i3-10320-vs-Intel-Celeron-G4900

Intel Core i3-10320 vs Intel Celeron G4900

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i3-10320 and Intel Celeron G4900

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i3-10320 has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G4900's 3.1 GHz. Intel Core i3-10320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G4900's GHz. Intel Core i3-10320 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G4900's 2 cores. Intel Core i3-10320 supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Celeron G4900's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i3-10320 uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while Intel Celeron G4900 uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket. Intel Core i3-10320 was launched in Q4 2020, while Intel Celeron G4900 was launched in Q2 2018. Intel Core i3-10320 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to Intel Celeron G4900's 2 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i3-10320 and Intel Celeron G4900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-10320 has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G4900 runs at 3.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-10320 supports a turbo speed of 4.6 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G4900.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-10320 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G4900 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-10320 supports 8 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G4900.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-10320 uses the FCLGA1200, while the Intel Celeron G4900 uses the FCLGA1151-2.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-10320 was launched on Q4 2020, while the Intel Celeron G4900 was released on Q2 2018.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10320 has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G4900.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i3-10320	Intel Celeron G4900

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	3.8 GHz	3.1 GHz
Turbo	4.6 GHz	GHz
Cores	4	2
Threads	8	2
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA1200	FCLGA1151-2
Launched	Q4 2020	Q2 2018
L3 Cache	8 MB	2 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i3-10320:

47%

Intel Celeron G4900:

30%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i3-10320

14%

Intel Celeron G4900:

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i3-10320: 65 watts

16.25%

Intel Celeron G4900: 54 watts

13.5%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i3-10320 : Q4 2020 ✅

Intel Celeron G4900 : Q2 2018 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i3-10320

Intel Celeron G4900

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i3-10320 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-10320 was launched more recently (Q4 2020) compared to the Intel Celeron G4900 (Q2 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-10320 has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G4900's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i3-10320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G4900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2839, the Intel Core i3-10320 outperforms the Intel Celeron G4900 (score: 1837). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10320 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the Intel Celeron G4900's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-10320 has a higher CPU Mark score of 71.51 compared to the Intel Celeron G4900's 35.07. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-10320 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G4900's 54W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Celeron G4900 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Not available

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G4900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10320's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G4900 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10320's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G4900 scores 2385, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-10320's score of 10011. This makes the Intel Core i3-10320 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

Intel Core i3-10320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron G4900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i3-10320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron G4900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict