Comparison between Intel Core i3-10325 and Intel Celeron G6900
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-10325 has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 3.4 GHz.
Intel Core i3-10325 has a higher turbo speed of 4.7 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G6900's GHz.
Intel Core i3-10325 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 2 cores.
Intel Core i3-10325 supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i3-10325 uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while Intel Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700,BGA1700 socket.
Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q1 2022.
Intel Core i3-10325 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i3-10325 and Intel Celeron G6900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-10325 has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G6900 runs at 3.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-10325 supports a turbo speed of 4.7 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G6900.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-10325 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-10325 supports 8 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G6900.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-10325 uses the FCLGA1200, while the Intel Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700,BGA1700.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-10325 was launched on Q1 2022, while the Intel Celeron G6900 was released on Q1 2022.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10325 has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Celeron G6900.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i3-10325
Intel Celeron G6900
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Turbo
4.7 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
8
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1200
LGA1700,BGA1700
Launched
Q1 2022
Q1 2022
L3 Cache
8 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-10325:
47%
Intel Celeron G6900:
45%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-10325
14%
Intel Celeron G6900:
6%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i3-10325: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron G6900: 46 watts
11.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i3-10325 : Q1 2022 ✅
Intel Celeron G6900 : Q1 2022 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i3-10325
Intel Celeron G6900
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i3-10325 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-10325 has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's 3.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i3-10325 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.7 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2874, the Intel Core i3-10325 outperforms the Intel Celeron G6900 (score: 2727). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10325 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-10325 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's 46W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron G6900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G6900 has a higher CPU Mark score of 101.15 compared to the Intel Core i3-10325's 54.13. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10325's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10325's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G6900 scores 4551, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-10325's score of 10291. This makes the Intel Core i3-10325 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i3-10325
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G6900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i3-10325
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G6900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i3-10325
The Intel Core i3-10325 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G6900
The Intel Celeron G6900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
