Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i3-10325-vs-Intel-Core-i3-4160

Intel Core i3-10325 vs Intel Core i3-4160

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i3-10325 and Intel Core i3-4160

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i3-10325 has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4160's 3.6 GHz. Intel Core i3-10325 has a higher turbo speed of 4.7 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4160's GHz. Intel Core i3-10325 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i3-4160's 2 cores. Intel Core i3-10325 supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Core i3-4160's 4 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i3-10325 uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while Intel Core i3-4160 uses the FCLGA1150 socket. Intel Core i3-10325 was launched in Q1 2022, while Intel Core i3-4160 was launched in Q3 2014. Intel Core i3-10325 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to Intel Core i3-4160's 3 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i3-10325 and Intel Core i3-4160 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-10325 has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-4160 runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-10325 supports a turbo speed of 4.7 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-4160.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-10325 has 4 cores, while the Intel Core i3-4160 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-10325 supports 8 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-4160.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-10325 uses the FCLGA1200, while the Intel Core i3-4160 uses the FCLGA1150.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-10325 was launched on Q1 2022, while the Intel Core i3-4160 was released on Q3 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10325 has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-4160.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i3-10325	Intel Core i3-4160

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	3.9 GHz	3.6 GHz
Turbo	4.7 GHz	GHz
Cores	4	2
Threads	8	4
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA1200	FCLGA1150
Launched	Q1 2022	Q3 2014
L3 Cache	8 MB	3 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i3-10325:

47%

Intel Core i3-4160:

33%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i3-10325

14%

Intel Core i3-4160:

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i3-10325: 65 watts

16.25%

Intel Core i3-4160: 54 watts

13.5%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i3-10325 : Q1 2022 ✅

Intel Core i3-4160 : Q3 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i3-10325

Intel Core i3-4160

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i3-10325 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-10325 has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4160's 3.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i3-10325 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.7 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4160's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2874, the Intel Core i3-10325 outperforms the Intel Core i3-4160 (score: 1997). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-10325 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the Intel Core i3-4160's 3MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-10325 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-4160's 54W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Core i3-4160 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-4160 was launched more recently (Q3 2014) compared to the Intel Core i3-10325 (Q1 2022). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-4160 has a higher CPU Mark score of 75.09 compared to the Intel Core i3-10325's 54.13. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-4160 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10325's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-4160 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10325's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-4160 scores 3522, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-10325's score of 10291. This makes the Intel Core i3-10325 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

Intel Core i3-10325
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Core i3-4160
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i3-10325
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Core i3-4160
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict