Comparison between Intel Core i3-3250T and AMD A10-8750
Intel Core i3-3250T is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD A10-8750 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 3.0 GHz.
AMD A10-8750 has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's GHz.
AMD A10-8750 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i3-3250T's 2 cores.
Intel Core i3-3250T supports more threads (4) compared to AMD A10-8750's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i3-3250T uses the FCLGA1155 socket, while AMD A10-8750 uses the FM2+ socket.
Intel Core i3-3250T was launched in Q1 2016, while AMD A10-8750 was launched in Q3 2015.
Intel Core i3-3250T has a larger L3 cache of 3 MB compared to AMD A10-8750's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i3-3250T and AMD A10-8750 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-3250T has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the AMD A10-8750 runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-3250T supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD A10-8750.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-3250T has 2 cores, while the AMD A10-8750 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-3250T supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A10-8750.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-3250T uses the FCLGA1155, while the AMD A10-8750 uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-3250T was launched on Q1 2016, while the AMD A10-8750 was released on Q3 2015.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-3250T has 3 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A10-8750.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i3-3250T
AMD A10-8750
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.0 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1155
FM2+
Launched
Q1 2016
Q3 2015
L3 Cache
3 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-3250T:
28%
AMD A10-8750:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-3250T
3%
AMD A10-8750:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i3-3250T: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD A10-8750: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i3-3250T : Q1 2016 ✅
AMD A10-8750 : Q3 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i3-3250T
AMD A10-8750
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i3-3250T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1684, the Intel Core i3-3250T outperforms the AMD A10-8750 (score: 1509). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-3250T features a larger L3 cache of 3MB compared to the AMD A10-8750's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-3250T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A10-8750's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-3250T scores 2650, which is lower than the AMD A10-8750's score of 3224. This makes the AMD A10-8750 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD A10-8750 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A10-8750 was launched more recently (Q3 2015) compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A10-8750 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's 3.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A10-8750 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-8750 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-3250T's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A10-8750 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-3250T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Core i3-3250T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A10-8750
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i3-3250T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD A10-8750
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i3-3250T
The Intel Core i3-3250T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A10-8750
The AMD A10-8750 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
