Comparison between Intel Core i3-4160T and AMD A10-6800B APU
Intel Core i3-4160T is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A10-6800B APU is manufactured by AMD.
AMD A10-6800B APU has a higher base speed of 4.1 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4160T's 3.1 GHz.
AMD A10-6800B APU has a higher turbo speed of 4.4 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4160T's GHz.
AMD A10-6800B APU has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i3-4160T's 2 cores.
Intel Core i3-4160T supports more threads (4) compared to AMD A10-6800B APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i3-4160T uses the LGA1150 socket, while AMD A10-6800B APU uses the FM2 socket.
Intel Core i3-4160T was launched in Q4 2014, while AMD A10-6800B APU was launched in Q1 2014.
Intel Core i3-4160T has a larger L3 cache of 3 MB compared to AMD A10-6800B APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i3-4160T and AMD A10-6800B APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-4160T has a base speed of 3.1 GHz, while the AMD A10-6800B APU runs at 4.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-4160T supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.4 GHz for the AMD A10-6800B APU.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-4160T has 2 cores, while the AMD A10-6800B APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-4160T supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A10-6800B APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-4160T uses the LGA1150, while the AMD A10-6800B APU uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-4160T was launched on Q4 2014, while the AMD A10-6800B APU was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-4160T has 3 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A10-6800B APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i3-4160T
AMD A10-6800B APU
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.4 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
LGA1150
FM2
Launched
Q4 2014
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
3 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-4160T:
29%
AMD A10-6800B APU:
27%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-4160T
4%
AMD A10-6800B APU:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i3-4160T: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD A10-6800B APU: 100 watts
25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i3-4160T : Q4 2014 ✅
AMD A10-6800B APU : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i3-4160T
AMD A10-6800B APU
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i3-4160T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-4160T was launched more recently (Q4 2014) compared to the AMD A10-6800B APU (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1751, the Intel Core i3-4160T outperforms the AMD A10-6800B APU (score: 1654). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-4160T features a larger L3 cache of 3MB compared to the AMD A10-6800B APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-4160T has a higher CPU Mark score of 51.89 compared to the AMD A10-6800B APU's 24.26. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-4160T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A10-6800B APU's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
AMD A10-6800B APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A10-6800B APU has a higher base clock speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4160T's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A10-6800B APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.4 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4160T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-6800B APU has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-4160T's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A10-6800B APU scores 3106, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-4160T's score of 3113. This makes the Intel Core i3-4160T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A10-6800B APU has a higher TDP of 100W compared to the Intel Core i3-4160T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Core i3-4160T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A10-6800B APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i3-4160T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD A10-6800B APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i3-4160T
The Intel Core i3-4160T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A10-6800B APU
The AMD A10-6800B APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
