Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i3-4170T-vs-AMD-Athlon-X4-840

Intel Core i3-4170T vs AMD Athlon X4 840

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i3-4170T and AMD Athlon X4 840

Intel Core i3-4170T is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon X4 840 is manufactured by AMD. Intel Core i3-4170T has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 840's 3.1 GHz. AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4170T's GHz. AMD Athlon X4 840 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Core i3-4170T's 2 cores. Intel Core i3-4170T supports more threads (4) compared to AMD Athlon X4 840's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i3-4170T uses the LGA1150 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 840 uses the FM2+ socket. Intel Core i3-4170T was launched in Q4 2015, while AMD Athlon X4 840 was launched in Q1 2015. Intel Core i3-4170T has a larger L3 cache of 3 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 840's MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i3-4170T and AMD Athlon X4 840 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-4170T has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 runs at 3.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-4170T supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-4170T has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-4170T supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-4170T uses the LGA1150, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-4170T was launched on Q4 2015, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 was released on Q1 2015.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-4170T has 3 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 840.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i3-4170T	AMD Athlon X4 840

Manufacturer	Intel	AMD
Speed	3.2 GHz	3.1 GHz
Turbo	GHz	3.8 GHz
Cores	2	4
Threads	4
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	LGA1150	FM2+
Launched	Q4 2015	Q1 2015
L3 Cache	3 MB	MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i3-4170T:

30%

AMD Athlon X4 840:

24%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i3-4170T

AMD Athlon X4 840:

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i3-4170T: 35 watts

8.75%

AMD Athlon X4 840: 65 watts

16.25%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i3-4170T : Q4 2015 ✅

AMD Athlon X4 840 : Q1 2015 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i3-4170T

AMD Athlon X4 840

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i3-4170T – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-4170T was launched more recently (Q4 2015) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840 (Q1 2015). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-4170T has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1824, the Intel Core i3-4170T outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 840 (score: 1488). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-4170T features a larger L3 cache of 3MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-4170T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 840's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-4170T scores 3218, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 840's score of 3318. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 840 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD Athlon X4 840 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 840 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4170T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher CPU Mark score of 26.55 compared to the Intel Core i3-4170T's 16.10. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 840 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-4170T's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-4170T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Productivity

Intel Core i3-4170T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Athlon X4 840
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i3-4170T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Athlon X4 840
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict