Intel Core i3-7300T vs AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
Table of Contents
Overview:
Comparison between Intel Core i3-7300T and AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
Intel Core i3-7300T is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core is manufactured by AMD.
Intel Core i3-7300T has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core's 2.5 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Intel Core i3-7300T supports more threads (4) compared to AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i3-7300T uses the FCLGA1151 socket, while AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core uses the FM1 socket.
Intel Core i3-7300T was launched in Q2 2017, while AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core was launched in Q2 2015.
Intel Core i3-7300T has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i3-7300T and AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-7300T has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core runs at 2.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-7300T supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-7300T has 2 cores, while the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-7300T supports 4 threads, compared to 2 threads for the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-7300T uses the FCLGA1151, while the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core uses the FM1.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-7300T was launched on Q2 2017, while the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core was released on Q2 2015.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-7300T has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i3-7300T
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
4
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151
FM1
Launched
Q2 2017
Q2 2015
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-7300T:
35%
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core:
17%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-7300T
6%
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i3-7300T: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i3-7300T : Q2 2017 ✅
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core : Q2 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i3-7300T
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i3-7300T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-7300T was launched more recently (Q2 2017) compared to the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core (Q2 2015). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-7300T has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core's 2.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2136, the Intel Core i3-7300T outperforms the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core (score: 1070). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-7300T features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i3-7300T's 32.65. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-7300T's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core scores 930, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-7300T's score of 4211. This makes the Intel Core i3-7300T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i3-7300T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Core i3-7300T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i3-7300T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i3-7300T
The Intel Core i3-7300T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
The AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.