Comparison between Intel Core i3-8100 and Intel Celeron G3900T
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-8100 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900T's 2.6 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Intel Core i3-8100 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3900T's 2 cores.
Intel Core i3-8100 supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3900T's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i3-8100 uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket, while Intel Celeron G3900T uses the socket.
Intel Core i3-8100 was launched in Q4 2017, while Intel Celeron G3900T was launched in Q2 2016.
Intel Core i3-8100 has a larger L3 cache of 6 MB compared to Intel Celeron G3900T's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i3-8100 and Intel Celeron G3900T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-8100 has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3900T runs at 2.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-8100 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3900T.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-8100 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3900T has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-8100 supports 4 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3900T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-8100 uses the FCLGA1151-2, while the Intel Celeron G3900T uses the .
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-8100 was launched on Q4 2017, while the Intel Celeron G3900T was released on Q2 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-8100 has 6 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3900T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Celeron G3900T
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151-2
Launched
Q4 2017
Q2 2016
L3 Cache
6 MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-8100:
36%
Intel Celeron G3900T:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-8100
8%
Intel Celeron G3900T:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i3-8100: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron G3900T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i3-8100 : Q4 2017 ✅
Intel Celeron G3900T : Q2 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Celeron G3900T
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i3-8100 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-8100 was launched more recently (Q4 2017) compared to the Intel Celeron G3900T (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-8100 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900T's 2.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2214, the Intel Core i3-8100 outperforms the Intel Celeron G3900T (score: 1560). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-8100 features a larger L3 cache of 6MB compared to the Intel Celeron G3900T's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-8100 has a higher CPU Mark score of 155.21 compared to the Intel Celeron G3900T's 17.96. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-8100 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G3900T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron G3900T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-8100's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G3900T has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-8100's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3900T scores 2020, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-8100's score of 6101. This makes the Intel Core i3-8100 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i3-8100
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G3900T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i3-8100
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G3900T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i3-8100
The Intel Core i3-8100 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G3900T
The Intel Celeron G3900T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
