Comparison between Intel Core i3-9100F and AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel Core i3-9100F is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.6 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of 4.2 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has more cores (6) compared to Intel Core i3-9100F's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Core i3-9100F's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i3-9100F uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Core i3-9100F was launched in Q2 2019, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X was launched in Q2 2018.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to Intel Core i3-9100F's 6 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i3-9100F and AMD Ryzen 5 2600X are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i3-9100F has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-9100F supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X.
Cores: The Intel Core i3-9100F has 4 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has 6 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i3-9100F supports 4 threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i3-9100F uses the FCLGA1151-2, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-9100F was launched on Q2 2019, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X was released on Q2 2018.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-9100F has 6 MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i3-9100F
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
4
6
Threads
4
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151-2
AM4
Launched
Q2 2019
Q2 2018
L3 Cache
6 MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-9100F:
41%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X:
39%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i3-9100F
9%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X:
20%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i3-9100F: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i3-9100F : Q2 2019 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X : Q2 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i3-9100F
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i3-9100F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-9100F was launched more recently (Q2 2019) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X (Q2 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2497, the Intel Core i3-9100F outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X (score: 2382). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-9100F has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-9100F has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-9100F scores 6736, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X's score of 13896. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the Intel Core i3-9100F's 6MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has a higher CPU Mark score of 193.30 compared to the Intel Core i3-9100F's 134.74. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Core i3-9100F's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Core i3-9100F
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i3-9100F
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i3-9100F
The Intel Core i3-9100F is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.