🚀 CPU Launch

Intel Core i3-9100F vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i3-9100F and AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Intel Core i3-9100F is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is manufactured by AMD. Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.6 GHz. Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of 4.2 GHz. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has more cores (6) compared to Intel Core i3-9100F's 4 cores. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Core i3-9100F's 4 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i3-9100F uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X uses the AM4 socket. Intel Core i3-9100F was launched in Q2 2019, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X was launched in Q2 2018. AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to Intel Core i3-9100F's 6 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i3-9100F and AMD Ryzen 5 2600X are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel Core i3-9100F has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X runs at 3.6 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i3-9100F supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X.
  • Cores: The Intel Core i3-9100F has 4 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has 6 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel Core i3-9100F supports 4 threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel Core i3-9100F uses the FCLGA1151-2, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X uses the AM4.
  • Launch Date: The Intel Core i3-9100F was launched on Q2 2019, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X was released on Q2 2018.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-9100F has 6 MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel Core i3-9100F AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel AMD
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Speed 3.6 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo 4.2 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FCLGA1151-2 AM4
Launched Q2 2019 Q2 2018
L3 Cache 6 MB 16 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i3-9100F:



41%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X:
39%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i3-9100F



9%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X:
20%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i3-9100F: 65 watts



16.25%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel Core i3-9100F : Q2 2019 ✅

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X : Q2 2018 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i3-9100F



AMD Ryzen 5 2600X


Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i3-9100F – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-9100F was launched more recently (Q2 2019) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X (Q2 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2497, the Intel Core i3-9100F outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X (score: 2382). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-9100F has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-9100F has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-9100F scores 6736, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X's score of 13896. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the Intel Core i3-9100F's 6MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has a higher CPU Mark score of 193.30 compared to the Intel Core i3-9100F's 134.74. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Core i3-9100F's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


Intel Core i3-9100F
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel Core i3-9100F
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel Core i3-9100F

The Intel Core i3-9100F is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.