Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i5-11600K-vs-Intel-Core-i3-9300

Intel Core i5-11600K vs Intel Core i3-9300

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i5-11600K and Intel Core i3-9300

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i5-11600K has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-9300's 3.7 GHz. Intel Core i5-11600K has a higher turbo speed of 4.9 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-9300's 4.3 GHz. Intel Core i5-11600K has more cores (6) compared to Intel Core i3-9300's 4 cores. Intel Core i5-11600K supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Core i3-9300's 4 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i5-11600K uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while Intel Core i3-9300 uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket. Intel Core i5-11600K was launched in Q2 2021, while Intel Core i3-9300 was launched in Q3 2019. Intel Core i5-11600K has a larger L3 cache of 12 MB compared to Intel Core i3-9300's 8 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i5-11600K and Intel Core i3-9300 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i5-11600K has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-9300 runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i5-11600K supports a turbo speed of 4.9 GHz, compared to 4.3 GHz for the Intel Core i3-9300.
Cores: The Intel Core i5-11600K has 6 cores, while the Intel Core i3-9300 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i5-11600K supports 12 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-9300.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i5-11600K uses the FCLGA1200, while the Intel Core i3-9300 uses the FCLGA1151-2.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i5-11600K was launched on Q2 2021, while the Intel Core i3-9300 was released on Q3 2019.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-11600K has 12 MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the Intel Core i3-9300.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i5-11600K	Intel Core i3-9300

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	3.9 GHz	3.7 GHz
Turbo	4.9 GHz	4.3 GHz
Cores	6	4
Threads	12	4
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA1200	FCLGA1151-2
Launched	Q2 2021	Q3 2019
L3 Cache	12 MB	8 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i5-11600K:

55%

Intel Core i3-9300:

42%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i5-11600K

28%

Intel Core i3-9300:

10%

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i5-11600K: 125 watts

31.25%

Intel Core i3-9300: 62 watts

15.5%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i5-11600K : Q2 2021 ✅

Intel Core i3-9300 : Q3 2019 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i5-11600K

Intel Core i3-9300

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i5-11600K – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i5-11600K has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-9300's 3.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i5-11600K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.9 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-9300's 4.3 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3347, the Intel Core i5-11600K outperforms the Intel Core i3-9300 (score: 2561). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-11600K features a larger L3 cache of 12MB compared to the Intel Core i3-9300's 8MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i5-11600K has a higher CPU Mark score of 131.64 compared to the Intel Core i3-9300's 29.51. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i5-11600K has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the Intel Core i3-9300's 62W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Core i3-9300 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-9300 was launched more recently (Q3 2019) compared to the Intel Core i5-11600K (Q2 2021). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-9300 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-11600K's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-9300 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-11600K's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-9300 scores 7137, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-11600K's score of 19572. This makes the Intel Core i5-11600K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

Intel Core i5-11600K
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Core i3-9300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i5-11600K
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.

Intel Core i3-9300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict