Comparison between Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD A9-9820
Intel Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A9-9820 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD A9-9820 has a higher base speed of 2.3 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-13400F's GHz.
AMD A9-9820 has a higher turbo speed of 2.4 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-13400F's GHz.
Intel Core i5-13400F has more cores (10) compared to AMD A9-9820's 8 cores.
AMD A9-9820 supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Core i5-13400F's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i5-13400F uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while AMD A9-9820 uses the socket.
Intel Core i5-13400F was launched in Q1 2023, while AMD A9-9820 was launched in Q2 2021.
Intel Core i5-13400F has a larger L3 cache of 20 MB compared to AMD A9-9820's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD A9-9820 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i5-13400F has a base speed of GHz, while the AMD A9-9820 runs at 2.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i5-13400F supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 2.4 GHz for the AMD A9-9820.
Cores: The Intel Core i5-13400F has 10 cores, while the AMD A9-9820 has 8 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i5-13400F supports threads, compared to 8 threads for the AMD A9-9820.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i5-13400F uses the FCLGA1700, while the AMD A9-9820 uses the .
Launch Date: The Intel Core i5-13400F was launched on Q1 2023, while the AMD A9-9820 was released on Q2 2021.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-13400F has 20 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A9-9820.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i5-13400F
AMD A9-9820
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
GHz
2.3 GHz
Turbo
GHz
2.4 GHz
Cores
10
8
Threads
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1700
Launched
Q1 2023
Q2 2021
L3 Cache
20 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i5-13400F:
60%
AMD A9-9820:
13%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i5-13400F
36%
AMD A9-9820:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i5-13400F: 148 watts
37%
AMD A9-9820: watts
0%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i5-13400F : Q1 2023 ✅
AMD A9-9820 : Q2 2021 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i5-13400F
AMD A9-9820
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i5-13400F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3643, the Intel Core i5-13400F outperforms the AMD A9-9820 (score: 800). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-13400F features a larger L3 cache of 20MB compared to the AMD A9-9820's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i5-13400F has threads, which is fewer than the AMD A9-9820's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i5-13400F has a higher TDP of 148W compared to the AMD A9-9820's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD A9-9820 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A9-9820 was launched more recently (Q2 2021) compared to the Intel Core i5-13400F (Q1 2023). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A9-9820 has a higher base clock speed of 2.3 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-13400F's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A9-9820 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.4 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-13400F's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A9-9820 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i5-13400F's 176.77. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD A9-9820 has 8 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-13400F's 10 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A9-9820 scores 3938, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-13400F's score of 25129. This makes the Intel Core i5-13400F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i5-13400F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A9-9820
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i5-13400F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD A9-9820
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i5-13400F
The Intel Core i5-13400F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A9-9820
The AMD A9-9820 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
