Comparison between Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD PRO A8-8670E
Intel Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel, while AMD PRO A8-8670E is manufactured by AMD.
AMD PRO A8-8670E has a higher base speed of 2.8 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-13400F's GHz.
AMD PRO A8-8670E has a higher turbo speed of 3.3 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-13400F's GHz.
Intel Core i5-13400F has more cores (10) compared to AMD PRO A8-8670E's 4 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i5-13400F uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while AMD PRO A8-8670E uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Core i5-13400F was launched in Q1 2023, while AMD PRO A8-8670E was launched in Q3 2017.
Intel Core i5-13400F has a larger L3 cache of 20 MB compared to AMD PRO A8-8670E's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD PRO A8-8670E are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i5-13400F has a base speed of GHz, while the AMD PRO A8-8670E runs at 2.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i5-13400F supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.3 GHz for the AMD PRO A8-8670E.
Cores: The Intel Core i5-13400F has 10 cores, while the AMD PRO A8-8670E has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i5-13400F supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD PRO A8-8670E.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i5-13400F uses the FCLGA1700, while the AMD PRO A8-8670E uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i5-13400F was launched on Q1 2023, while the AMD PRO A8-8670E was released on Q3 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-13400F has 20 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD PRO A8-8670E.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i5-13400F
AMD PRO A8-8670E
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
GHz
2.8 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.3 GHz
Cores
10
4
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1700
AM4
Launched
Q1 2023
Q3 2017
L3 Cache
20 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i5-13400F:
60%
AMD PRO A8-8670E:
23%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i5-13400F
36%
AMD PRO A8-8670E:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i5-13400F: 148 watts
37%
AMD PRO A8-8670E: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i5-13400F : Q1 2023 ✅
AMD PRO A8-8670E : Q3 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i5-13400F
AMD PRO A8-8670E
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i5-13400F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3643, the Intel Core i5-13400F outperforms the AMD PRO A8-8670E (score: 1382). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-13400F features a larger L3 cache of 20MB compared to the AMD PRO A8-8670E's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i5-13400F has a higher TDP of 148W compared to the AMD PRO A8-8670E's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD PRO A8-8670E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD PRO A8-8670E was launched more recently (Q3 2017) compared to the Intel Core i5-13400F (Q1 2023). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A8-8670E has a higher base clock speed of 2.8 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-13400F's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A8-8670E supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.3 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-13400F's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD PRO A8-8670E has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i5-13400F's 176.77. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD PRO A8-8670E has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-13400F's 10 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD PRO A8-8670E scores 2989, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-13400F's score of 25129. This makes the Intel Core i5-13400F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i5-13400F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD PRO A8-8670E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i5-13400F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD PRO A8-8670E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i5-13400F
The Intel Core i5-13400F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD PRO A8-8670E
The AMD PRO A8-8670E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
