Comparison between Intel Core i5-13600 and Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Core i5-13600's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Intel Core i5-13600 has more cores (14) compared to Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz's 1 cores.
Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz supports more threads (2) compared to Intel Core i5-13600's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i5-13600 uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz uses the socket.
Intel Core i5-13600 was launched in Q1 2023, while Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz was launched in Q2 2018.
Intel Core i5-13600 has a larger L3 cache of 24 MB compared to Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i5-13600 and Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i5-13600 has a base speed of GHz, while the Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz runs at 3.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i5-13600 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz.
Cores: The Intel Core i5-13600 has 14 cores, while the Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz has 1 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i5-13600 supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i5-13600 uses the FCLGA1700, while the Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz uses the .
Launch Date: The Intel Core i5-13600 was launched on Q1 2023, while the Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz was released on Q2 2018.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-13600 has 24 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i5-13600
Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
GHz
3.8 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
14
1
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1700
Launched
Q1 2023
Q2 2018
L3 Cache
24 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i5-13600:
67%
Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz:
3%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i5-13600
46%
Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz:
0%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i5-13600: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz: watts
0%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i5-13600 : Q1 2023 ✅
Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz : Q2 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i5-13600
Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i5-13600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 4048, the Intel Core i5-13600 outperforms the Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz (score: 237). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-13600 features a larger L3 cache of 24MB compared to the Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i5-13600 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i5-13600 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz was launched more recently (Q2 2018) compared to the Intel Core i5-13600 (Q1 2023). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Core i5-13600's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i5-13600's 124.97. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz has 1 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-13600's 14 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz scores 154, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-13600's score of 31868. This makes the Intel Core i5-13600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i5-13600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i5-13600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i5-13600
The Intel Core i5-13600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz
The Intel Pentium 4 3.83GHz is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
