Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i5-7640X-vs-Intel-Celeron-G3900

Intel Core i5-7640X vs Intel Celeron G3900

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i5-7640X and Intel Celeron G3900

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i5-7640X has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz. Intel Core i5-7640X has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's GHz. Intel Core i5-7640X has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 cores. Intel Core i5-7640X supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i5-7640X uses the FCLGA2066 socket, while Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151 socket. Intel Core i5-7640X was launched in Q3 2017, while Intel Celeron G3900 was launched in Q1 2016. Intel Core i5-7640X has a larger L3 cache of 6 MB compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i5-7640X and Intel Celeron G3900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i5-7640X has a base speed of 4.0 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3900 runs at 2.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i5-7640X supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Cores: The Intel Core i5-7640X has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i5-7640X supports 4 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i5-7640X uses the FCLGA2066, while the Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i5-7640X was launched on Q3 2017, while the Intel Celeron G3900 was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-7640X has 6 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3900.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i5-7640X	Intel Celeron G3900

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	4.0 GHz	2.8 GHz
Turbo	4.2 GHz	GHz
Cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA2066	FCLGA1151
Launched	Q3 2017	Q1 2016
L3 Cache	6 MB	2 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i5-7640X:

42%

Intel Celeron G3900:

28%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i5-7640X

10%

Intel Celeron G3900:

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i5-7640X: 112 watts

28%

Intel Celeron G3900: 51 watts

12.75%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i5-7640X : Q3 2017 ✅

Intel Celeron G3900 : Q1 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i5-7640X

Intel Celeron G3900

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i5-7640X – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i5-7640X was launched more recently (Q3 2017) compared to the Intel Celeron G3900 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i5-7640X has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i5-7640X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2535, the Intel Core i5-7640X outperforms the Intel Celeron G3900 (score: 1690). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i5-7640X features a larger L3 cache of 6MB compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i5-7640X has a higher TDP of 112W compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Celeron G3900 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher CPU Mark score of 134.42 compared to the Intel Core i5-7640X's 47.22. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-7640X's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i5-7640X's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3900 scores 2148, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-7640X's score of 7036. This makes the Intel Core i5-7640X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

Intel Core i5-7640X
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron G3900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i5-7640X
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron G3900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict