🚀 CPU Launch

Intel Core i7-7700T vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i7-7700T and AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Intel Core i7-7700T is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is manufactured by AMD. AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to Intel Core i7-7700T's 2.9 GHz. Intel Core i7-7700T has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 1600's 3.6 GHz. AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has more cores (6) compared to Intel Core i7-7700T's 4 cores. AMD Ryzen 5 1600 supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Core i7-7700T's 8 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i7-7700T uses the FCLGA1151 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 uses the AM4 socket. Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q1 2017. AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to Intel Core i7-7700T's 8 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i7-7700T and AMD Ryzen 5 1600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel Core i7-7700T has a base speed of 2.9 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 runs at 3.2 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i7-7700T supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to 3.6 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.
  • Cores: The Intel Core i7-7700T has 4 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has 6 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel Core i7-7700T supports 8 threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel Core i7-7700T uses the FCLGA1151, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 uses the AM4.
  • Launch Date: The Intel Core i7-7700T was launched on Q1 2017, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 was released on Q1 2017.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel Core i7-7700T has 8 MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel Core i7-7700T AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Intel AMD
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Speed 2.9 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo 3.8 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FCLGA1151 AM4
Launched Q1 2017 Q1 2017
L3 Cache 8 MB 16 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i7-7700T:



35%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600:
34%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i7-7700T



10%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600:
17%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i7-7700T: 35 watts



8.75%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel Core i7-7700T : Q1 2017 ✅

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 : Q1 2017 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i7-7700T



AMD Ryzen 5 1600


Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i7-7700T – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i7-7700T supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's 3.6 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2145, the Intel Core i7-7700T outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (score: 2066). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i7-7700T has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i7-7700T has 8 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i7-7700T scores 7582, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's score of 12278. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the Intel Core i7-7700T's 2.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the Intel Core i7-7700T's 8MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher CPU Mark score of 204.67 compared to the Intel Core i7-7700T's 54.16. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i7-7700T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


Intel Core i7-7700T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel Core i7-7700T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel Core i7-7700T

The Intel Core i7-7700T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.