Comparison between Intel Core i7-9700F and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Intel Core i7-9700F is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Core i7-9700F's 3.0 GHz.
Intel Core i7-9700F has a higher turbo speed of 4.7 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's GHz.
Intel Core i7-9700F has more cores (8) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's 6 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Core i7-9700F's 8 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i7-9700F uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Core i7-9700F was launched in Q2 2019, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was launched in Q3 2019.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to Intel Core i7-9700F's 12 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i7-9700F and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i7-9700F has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i7-9700F supports a turbo speed of 4.7 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600.
Cores: The Intel Core i7-9700F has 8 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has 6 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i7-9700F supports 8 threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i7-9700F uses the FCLGA1151-2, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i7-9700F was launched on Q2 2019, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was released on Q3 2019.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i7-9700F has 12 MB of L3 cache, compared to 32 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i7-9700F
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.0 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
4.7 GHz
GHz
Cores
8
6
Threads
8
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151-2
AM4
Launched
Q2 2019
Q3 2019
L3 Cache
12 MB
32 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i7-9700F:
45%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600:
41%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i7-9700F
19%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600:
25%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i7-9700F: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i7-9700F : Q2 2019 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 : Q3 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i7-9700F
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i7-9700F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i7-9700F supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.7 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2751, the Intel Core i7-9700F outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 (score: 2495). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i7-9700F has 8 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i7-9700F scores 13244, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's score of 17402. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was launched more recently (Q3 2019) compared to the Intel Core i7-9700F (Q2 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Core i7-9700F's 3.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the Intel Core i7-9700F's 12MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i7-9700F's 110.63. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has 6 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i7-9700F's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Productivity
Intel Core i7-9700F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i7-9700F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i7-9700F
The Intel Core i7-9700F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.