Comparison between Intel Core i9-10900F and AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher base speed of 3.4 GHz compared to Intel Core i9-10900F's 2.8 GHz.
Intel Core i9-10900F has a higher turbo speed of 5.2 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 2600's 3.9 GHz.
Intel Core i9-10900F has more cores (10) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 2600's 6 cores.
Intel Core i9-10900F supports more threads (20) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 2600's 12 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i9-10900F uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Core i9-10900F was launched in Q3 2020, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 was launched in Q2 2018.
Intel Core i9-10900F has a larger L3 cache of 20 MB compared to AMD Ryzen 5 2600's 16 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i9-10900F and AMD Ryzen 5 2600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-10900F has a base speed of 2.8 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 runs at 3.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-10900F supports a turbo speed of 5.2 GHz, compared to 3.9 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-10900F has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has 6 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-10900F supports 20 threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-10900F uses the FCLGA1200, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-10900F was launched on Q3 2020, while the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 was released on Q2 2018.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10900F has 20 MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i9-10900F
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Turbo
5.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Cores
10
6
Threads
20
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1200
AM4
Launched
Q3 2020
Q2 2018
L3 Cache
20 MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-10900F:
50%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600:
37%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-10900F
28%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600:
19%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i9-10900F: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i9-10900F : Q3 2020 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 : Q2 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i9-10900F
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i9-10900F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i9-10900F was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 (Q2 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i9-10900F supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.2 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600's 3.9 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3030, the Intel Core i9-10900F outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 (score: 2244). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10900F features a larger L3 cache of 20MB compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 2600's 16MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the Intel Core i9-10900F's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher CPU Mark score of 264.39 compared to the Intel Core i9-10900F's 46.90. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has 6 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10900F's 10 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has 12 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10900F's 20 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 scores 13188, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-10900F's score of 19891. This makes the Intel Core i9-10900F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i9-10900F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i9-10900F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i9-10900F
The Intel Core i9-10900F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
