Comparison between Intel Core i9-10900X and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Intel Core i9-10900X is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.7 GHz.
Intel Core i9-10900X has a higher turbo speed of 4.7 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 4.2 GHz.
Intel Core i9-10900X has more cores (10) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 4 cores.
Intel Core i9-10900X supports more threads (20) compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 8 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i9-10900X uses the FCLGA2066 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the AM4 socket.
Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q4 2019.
Intel Core i9-10900X has a larger L3 cache of 19 MB compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i9-10900X and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-10900X has a base speed of 3.7 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-10900X supports a turbo speed of 4.7 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-10900X has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-10900X supports 20 threads, compared to 8 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-10900X uses the FCLGA2066, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-10900X was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G was released on Q4 2019.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10900X has 19 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i9-10900X
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
4.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
10
4
Threads
20
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA2066
AM4
Launched
Q4 2019
Q4 2019
L3 Cache
19 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-10900X:
44%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G:
38%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-10900X
32%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G:
13%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i9-10900X: 165 watts
41.25%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i9-10900X : Q4 2019 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G : Q4 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i9-10900X
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i9-10900X – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i9-10900X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.7 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 4.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2675, the Intel Core i9-10900X outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G (score: 2302). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-10900X features a larger L3 cache of 19MB compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i9-10900X has a higher TDP of 165W compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i9-10900X's 39.75. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10900X's 10 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has 8 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10900X's 20 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G scores 9081, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-10900X's score of 22457. This makes the Intel Core i9-10900X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i9-10900X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i9-10900X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i9-10900X
The Intel Core i9-10900X is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
