Comparison between Intel Core i9-13900F and Intel Core i3-10105
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-10105 has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to Intel Core i9-13900F's GHz.
Intel Core i3-10105 has a higher turbo speed of 4.4 GHz compared to Intel Core i9-13900F's GHz.
Intel Core i9-13900F has more cores (24) compared to Intel Core i3-10105's 4 cores.
Intel Core i3-10105 supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Core i9-13900F's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i9-13900F uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while Intel Core i3-10105 uses the FCLGA1200 socket.
Intel Core i9-13900F was launched in Q1 2023, while Intel Core i3-10105 was launched in Q2 2021.
Intel Core i9-13900F has a larger L3 cache of 36 MB compared to Intel Core i3-10105's 6 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i9-13900F and Intel Core i3-10105 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-13900F has a base speed of GHz, while the Intel Core i3-10105 runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-13900F supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.4 GHz for the Intel Core i3-10105.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-13900F has 24 cores, while the Intel Core i3-10105 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-13900F supports threads, compared to 8 threads for the Intel Core i3-10105.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-13900F uses the FCLGA1700, while the Intel Core i3-10105 uses the FCLGA1200.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-13900F was launched on Q1 2023, while the Intel Core i3-10105 was released on Q2 2021.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-13900F has 36 MB of L3 cache, compared to 6 MB for the Intel Core i3-10105.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i9-13900F
Intel Core i3-10105
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.4 GHz
Cores
24
4
Threads
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1700
FCLGA1200
Launched
Q1 2023
Q2 2021
L3 Cache
36 MB
6 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-13900F:
73%
Intel Core i3-10105:
44%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-13900F
73%
Intel Core i3-10105:
12%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i9-13900F: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Core i3-10105: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i9-13900F : Q1 2023 ✅
Intel Core i3-10105 : Q2 2021 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i9-13900F
Intel Core i3-10105
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i9-13900F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 4417, the Intel Core i9-13900F outperforms the Intel Core i3-10105 (score: 2675). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-13900F features a larger L3 cache of 36MB compared to the Intel Core i3-10105's 6MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i9-13900F has a higher CPU Mark score of 130.03 compared to the Intel Core i3-10105's 100.61. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i9-13900F has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-10105's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Intel Core i3-10105 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-10105 was launched more recently (Q2 2021) compared to the Intel Core i9-13900F (Q1 2023). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-10105 has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the Intel Core i9-13900F's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i3-10105 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.4 GHz compared to the Intel Core i9-13900F's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-10105 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-13900F's 24 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-10105 scores 8547, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-13900F's score of 50712. This makes the Intel Core i9-13900F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i9-13900F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-10105
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i9-13900F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-10105
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i9-13900F
The Intel Core i9-13900F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-10105
The Intel Core i3-10105 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
