Comparison between Intel Core i9-13900KF and AMD A4-6320 APU
Intel Core i9-13900KF is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A4-6320 APU is manufactured by AMD.
AMD A4-6320 APU has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Core i9-13900KF's GHz.
AMD A4-6320 APU has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Core i9-13900KF's GHz.
Intel Core i9-13900KF has more cores (24) compared to AMD A4-6320 APU's 2 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i9-13900KF uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while AMD A4-6320 APU uses the FM2 socket.
Intel Core i9-13900KF was launched in Q4 2022, while AMD A4-6320 APU was launched in Q2 2014.
Intel Core i9-13900KF has a larger L3 cache of 36 MB compared to AMD A4-6320 APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i9-13900KF and AMD A4-6320 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-13900KF has a base speed of GHz, while the AMD A4-6320 APU runs at 3.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-13900KF supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD A4-6320 APU.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-13900KF has 24 cores, while the AMD A4-6320 APU has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-13900KF supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD A4-6320 APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-13900KF uses the FCLGA1700, while the AMD A4-6320 APU uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-13900KF was launched on Q4 2022, while the AMD A4-6320 APU was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-13900KF has 36 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A4-6320 APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i9-13900KF
AMD A4-6320 APU
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
GHz
3.8 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
24
2
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1700
FM2
Launched
Q4 2022
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
36 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-13900KF:
76%
AMD A4-6320 APU:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-13900KF
84%
AMD A4-6320 APU:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i9-13900KF: 125 watts
31.25%
AMD A4-6320 APU: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i9-13900KF : Q4 2022 ✅
AMD A4-6320 APU : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i9-13900KF
AMD A4-6320 APU
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i9-13900KF – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i9-13900KF was launched more recently (Q4 2022) compared to the AMD A4-6320 APU (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 4607, the Intel Core i9-13900KF outperforms the AMD A4-6320 APU (score: 1529). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-13900KF features a larger L3 cache of 36MB compared to the AMD A4-6320 APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i9-13900KF has a higher CPU Mark score of 145.76 compared to the AMD A4-6320 APU's 21.86. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i9-13900KF has a higher TDP of 125W compared to the AMD A4-6320 APU's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD A4-6320 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A4-6320 APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Core i9-13900KF's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A4-6320 APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Core i9-13900KF's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD A4-6320 APU has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-13900KF's 24 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A4-6320 APU scores 1530, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-13900KF's score of 58243. This makes the Intel Core i9-13900KF a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i9-13900KF
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A4-6320 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD A4-6320 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i9-13900KF
The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A4-6320 APU
The AMD A4-6320 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
