Comparison between Intel Core i9-14900KS and AMD PRO A10-8770E
Intel Core i9-14900KS is manufactured by Intel, while AMD PRO A10-8770E is manufactured by AMD.
AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher base speed of 2.8 GHz compared to Intel Core i9-14900KS's GHz.
AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher turbo speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Core i9-14900KS's GHz.
Intel Core i9-14900KS has more cores (24) compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's 4 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads ().
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i9-14900KS uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while AMD PRO A10-8770E uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Core i9-14900KS was launched in Q1 2024, while AMD PRO A10-8770E was launched in Q1 2017.
Intel Core i9-14900KS has a larger L3 cache of 36 MB compared to AMD PRO A10-8770E's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i9-14900KS and AMD PRO A10-8770E are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-14900KS has a base speed of GHz, while the AMD PRO A10-8770E runs at 2.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-14900KS supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.5 GHz for the AMD PRO A10-8770E.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-14900KS has 24 cores, while the AMD PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-14900KS supports threads, compared to threads for the AMD PRO A10-8770E.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-14900KS uses the FCLGA1700, while the AMD PRO A10-8770E uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-14900KS was launched on Q1 2024, while the AMD PRO A10-8770E was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-14900KS has 36 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD PRO A10-8770E.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i9-14900KS
AMD PRO A10-8770E
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
GHz
2.8 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.5 GHz
Cores
24
4
Threads
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1700
AM4
Launched
Q1 2024
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
36 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-14900KS:
81%
AMD PRO A10-8770E:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-14900KS
90%
AMD PRO A10-8770E:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i9-14900KS: 150 watts
37.5%
AMD PRO A10-8770E: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i9-14900KS : Q1 2024 ✅
AMD PRO A10-8770E : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i9-14900KS
AMD PRO A10-8770E
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i9-14900KS – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i9-14900KS was launched more recently (Q1 2024) compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 4864, the Intel Core i9-14900KS outperforms the AMD PRO A10-8770E (score: 1450). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-14900KS features a larger L3 cache of 36MB compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i9-14900KS has a higher TDP of 150W compared to the AMD PRO A10-8770E's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD PRO A10-8770E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher base clock speed of 2.8 GHz compared to the Intel Core i9-14900KS's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A10-8770E supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Core i9-14900KS's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i9-14900KS's 95.62. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-14900KS's 24 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD PRO A10-8770E scores 3037, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-14900KS's score of 62150. This makes the Intel Core i9-14900KS a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i9-14900KS
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD PRO A10-8770E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i9-14900KS
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD PRO A10-8770E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i9-14900KS
The Intel Core i9-14900KS is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD PRO A10-8770E
The AMD PRO A10-8770E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
