Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i9-9820X-vs-Intel-Core-i3-4160T

Intel Core i9-9820X vs Intel Core i3-4160T

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i9-9820X and Intel Core i3-4160T

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i9-9820X has a higher base speed of 3.3 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4160T's 3.1 GHz. Intel Core i9-9820X has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4160T's GHz. Intel Core i9-9820X has more cores (10) compared to Intel Core i3-4160T's 2 cores. Intel Core i9-9820X supports more threads (20) compared to Intel Core i3-4160T's 4 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i9-9820X uses the FCLGA2066 socket, while Intel Core i3-4160T uses the LGA1150 socket. Intel Core i9-9820X was launched in Q4 2018, while Intel Core i3-4160T was launched in Q4 2014. Intel Core i9-9820X has a larger L3 cache of 17 MB compared to Intel Core i3-4160T's 3 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i9-9820X and Intel Core i3-4160T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-9820X has a base speed of 3.3 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-4160T runs at 3.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-9820X supports a turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-4160T.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-9820X has 10 cores, while the Intel Core i3-4160T has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-9820X supports 20 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-4160T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-9820X uses the FCLGA2066, while the Intel Core i3-4160T uses the LGA1150.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-9820X was launched on Q4 2018, while the Intel Core i3-4160T was released on Q4 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-9820X has 17 MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-4160T.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i9-9820X	Intel Core i3-4160T

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	3.3 GHz	3.1 GHz
Turbo	4.2 GHz	GHz
Cores	10	2
Threads	20	4
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA2066	LGA1150
Launched	Q4 2018	Q4 2014
L3 Cache	17 MB	3 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i9-9820X:

40%

Intel Core i3-4160T:

29%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i9-9820X

29%

Intel Core i3-4160T:

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i9-9820X: 165 watts

41.25%

Intel Core i3-4160T: 35 watts

8.75%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i9-9820X : Q4 2018 ✅

Intel Core i3-4160T : Q4 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i9-9820X

Intel Core i3-4160T

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i9-9820X – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i9-9820X was launched more recently (Q4 2018) compared to the Intel Core i3-4160T (Q4 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i9-9820X has a higher base clock speed of 3.3 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4160T's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i9-9820X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4160T's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2457, the Intel Core i9-9820X outperforms the Intel Core i3-4160T (score: 1751). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-9820X features a larger L3 cache of 17MB compared to the Intel Core i3-4160T's 3MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i9-9820X has a higher TDP of 165W compared to the Intel Core i3-4160T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Core i3-4160T – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-4160T has a higher CPU Mark score of 51.89 compared to the Intel Core i9-9820X's 49.16. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-4160T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-9820X's 10 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-4160T has 4 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-9820X's 20 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-4160T scores 3113, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-9820X's score of 20245. This makes the Intel Core i9-9820X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

Intel Core i9-9820X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Core i3-4160T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i9-9820X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.

Intel Core i3-4160T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict