Comparison between Intel Core i9-9900B and Intel Celeron J3060
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i9-9900B has a higher base speed of 3.1 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 1.6 GHz.
Intel Core i9-9900B has a higher turbo speed of 5.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2.5 GHz.
Intel Core i9-9900B has more cores (8) compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2 cores.
Intel Core i9-9900B supports more threads (16) compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core i9-9900B uses the FCLGA1151 socket, while Intel Celeron J3060 uses the BGA1170 socket.
Intel Core i9-9900B was launched in Q2 2024, while Intel Celeron J3060 was launched in Q3 2016.
Intel Core i9-9900B has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to Intel Celeron J3060's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core i9-9900B and Intel Celeron J3060 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-9900B has a base speed of 3.1 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J3060 runs at 1.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-9900B supports a turbo speed of 5.0 GHz, compared to 2.5 GHz for the Intel Celeron J3060.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-9900B has 8 cores, while the Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-9900B supports 16 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron J3060.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-9900B uses the FCLGA1151, while the Intel Celeron J3060 uses the BGA1170.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-9900B was launched on Q2 2024, while the Intel Celeron J3060 was released on Q3 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-9900B has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J3060.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core i9-9900B
Intel Celeron J3060
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Turbo
5.0 GHz
2.5 GHz
Cores
8
2
Threads
16
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151
BGA1170
Launched
Q2 2024
Q3 2016
L3 Cache
16 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-9900B:
45%
Intel Celeron J3060:
10%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core i9-9900B
24%
Intel Celeron J3060:
0%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core i9-9900B: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron J3060: 6 watts
1.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core i9-9900B : Q2 2024 ✅
Intel Celeron J3060 : Q3 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core i9-9900B
Intel Celeron J3060
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core i9-9900B – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i9-9900B has a higher base clock speed of 3.1 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 1.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i9-9900B supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 2.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2700, the Intel Core i9-9900B outperforms the Intel Celeron J3060 (score: 635). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-9900B features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i9-9900B has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 6W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron J3060 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron J3060 was launched more recently (Q3 2016) compared to the Intel Core i9-9900B (Q2 2024). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-9900B's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-9900B's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J3060 scores 678, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-9900B's score of 16588. This makes the Intel Core i9-9900B a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Core i9-9900B
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J3060
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core i9-9900B
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J3060
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core i9-9900B
The Intel Core i9-9900B is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J3060
The Intel Celeron J3060 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
