Home » Compare » Intel-Core-i9-9940X-vs-Intel-Celeron-J3060

Intel Core i9-9940X vs Intel Celeron J3060

Overview:

Comparison between Intel Core i9-9940X and Intel Celeron J3060

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Core i9-9940X has a higher base speed of 3.3 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 1.6 GHz. Intel Core i9-9940X has a higher turbo speed of 4.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2.5 GHz. Intel Core i9-9940X has more cores (14) compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2 cores. Intel Core i9-9940X supports more threads (28) compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Core i9-9940X uses the FCLGA2066 socket, while Intel Celeron J3060 uses the BGA1170 socket. Intel Core i9-9940X was launched in Q4 2018, while Intel Celeron J3060 was launched in Q3 2016. Intel Core i9-9940X has a larger L3 cache of 19 MB compared to Intel Celeron J3060's MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Core i9-9940X and Intel Celeron J3060 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core i9-9940X has a base speed of 3.3 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J3060 runs at 1.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core i9-9940X supports a turbo speed of 4.5 GHz, compared to 2.5 GHz for the Intel Celeron J3060.
Cores: The Intel Core i9-9940X has 14 cores, while the Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core i9-9940X supports 28 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron J3060.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core i9-9940X uses the FCLGA2066, while the Intel Celeron J3060 uses the BGA1170.
Launch Date: The Intel Core i9-9940X was launched on Q4 2018, while the Intel Celeron J3060 was released on Q3 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-9940X has 19 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J3060.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	Intel Core i9-9940X	Intel Celeron J3060

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Speed	3.3 GHz	1.6 GHz
Turbo	4.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
Cores	14	2
Threads	28	2
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	FCLGA2066	BGA1170
Launched	Q4 2018	Q3 2016
L3 Cache	19 MB	MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Core i9-9940X:

43%

Intel Celeron J3060:

10%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Core i9-9940X

40%

Intel Celeron J3060:

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Core i9-9940X: 165 watts

41.25%

Intel Celeron J3060: 6 watts

1.5%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

Intel Core i9-9940X : Q4 2018 ✅

Intel Celeron J3060 : Q3 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Core i9-9940X

Intel Celeron J3060

Pro's and Con's

Intel Core i9-9940X – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The Intel Core i9-9940X was launched more recently (Q4 2018) compared to the Intel Celeron J3060 (Q3 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i9-9940X has a higher base clock speed of 3.3 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 1.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i9-9940X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 2.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2629, the Intel Core i9-9940X outperforms the Intel Celeron J3060 (score: 635). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i9-9940X features a larger L3 cache of 19MB compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i9-9940X has a higher TDP of 165W compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 6W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Celeron J3060 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J3060 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i9-9940X's 30.21. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-9940X's 14 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-9940X's 28 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J3060 scores 678, which is lower than the Intel Core i9-9940X's score of 28064. This makes the Intel Core i9-9940X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

Intel Core i9-9940X
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron J3060
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

Intel Core i9-9940X
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.

Intel Celeron J3060
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict