Comparison between Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 2.4 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a higher turbo speed of 3.7 GHz compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 uses the socket, while AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched in Q4 2019, while AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 was launched in Q3 2017.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has a base speed of 2.4 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.7 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.
Cores: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 4 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 uses the , while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched on Q4 2019, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 was released on Q3 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.7 GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
Launched
Q4 2019
Q3 2017
L3 Cache
MB
8 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200:
18%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300:
36%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
2%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300:
10%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200: watts
0%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 : Q4 2019 ✅
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 : Q3 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 (Q3 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 scores 2011, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300's score of 7234. This makes the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 2.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2187, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 outperforms the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 (score: 1080). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 features a larger L3 cache of 8MB compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
