Comparison between Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Celeron G1820T
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 2.4 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G1820T's 2 cores.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G1820T's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 uses the socket, while Intel Celeron G1820T uses the LGA1150 socket.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched in Q4 2019, while Intel Celeron G1820T was launched in Q1 2014.
Intel Celeron G1820T has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Celeron G1820T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has a base speed of 2.4 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G1820T runs at 2.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G1820T.
Cores: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron G1820T has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 supports 4 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G1820T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 uses the , while the Intel Celeron G1820T uses the LGA1150.
Launch Date: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched on Q4 2019, while the Intel Celeron G1820T was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G1820T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Intel Celeron G1820T
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
LGA1150
Launched
Q4 2019
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200:
18%
Intel Celeron G1820T:
23%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
2%
Intel Celeron G1820T:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200: watts
0%
Intel Celeron G1820T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 : Q4 2019 ✅
Intel Celeron G1820T : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Intel Celeron G1820T
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the Intel Celeron G1820T (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G1820T's 38.84. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
Intel Celeron G1820T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1394, the Intel Celeron G1820T outperforms the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 (score: 1080). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G1820T features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G1820T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G1820T has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G1820T scores 1631, which is lower than the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's score of 2011. This makes the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G1820T has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G1820T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G1820T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G1820T
The Intel Celeron G1820T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
