Comparison between Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Celeron J4005
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has a higher base speed of 2.4 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4005's 2.0 GHz.
Intel Celeron J4005 has a higher turbo speed of 2.7 GHz compared to Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's GHz.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron J4005's 2 cores.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron J4005's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 uses the socket, while Intel Celeron J4005 uses the FCBGA1090 socket.
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched in Q4 2019, while Intel Celeron J4005 was launched in Q1 2018.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 and Intel Celeron J4005 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has a base speed of 2.4 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J4005 runs at 2.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 2.7 GHz for the Intel Celeron J4005.
Cores: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has 4 cores, while the Intel Celeron J4005 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 supports 4 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron J4005.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 uses the , while the Intel Celeron J4005 uses the FCBGA1090.
Launch Date: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched on Q4 2019, while the Intel Celeron J4005 was released on Q1 2018.
L3 Cache: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J4005.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Intel Celeron J4005
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
2.4 GHz
2.0 GHz
Turbo
GHz
2.7 GHz
Cores
4
2
Threads
4
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
Launched
Q4 2019
Q1 2018
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200:
18%
Intel Celeron J4005:
17%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
2%
Intel Celeron J4005:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200: watts
0%
Intel Celeron J4005: 10 watts
2.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 : Q4 2019 ✅
Intel Celeron J4005 : Q1 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Intel Celeron J4005
Pro's and Con's
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the Intel Celeron J4005 (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has a higher base clock speed of 2.4 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1080, the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 outperforms the Intel Celeron J4005 (score: 1071). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 8.96. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
Intel Celeron J4005 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron J4005 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.7 GHz compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J4005 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J4005 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4005 scores 1512, which is lower than the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's score of 2011. This makes the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron J4005 has a higher TDP of 10W compared to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J4005
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J4005
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200
The Intel Core2 Extreme Q9200 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J4005
The Intel Celeron J4005 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
