Intel Pentium Silver J5005 vs AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Table of Contents
Overview:
Comparison between Intel Pentium Silver J5005 and AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has a higher base speed of 2.7 GHz compared to Intel Pentium Silver J5005's 1.5 GHz.
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 has a higher turbo speed of 2.8 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1 socket.
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 was launched in Q4 2017, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched in Q2 2015.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 and AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 has a base speed of 1.5 GHz, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core runs at 2.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 supports a turbo speed of 2.8 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Cores: The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 has 4 cores, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 uses the FCBGA1090, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1.
Launch Date: The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 was launched on Q4 2017, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was released on Q2 2015.
L3 Cache: The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
1.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Turbo
2.8 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
FM1
Launched
Q4 2017
Q2 2015
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Pentium Silver J5005:
20%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
4%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Pentium Silver J5005: 10 watts
2.5%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 : Q4 2017 ✅
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core : Q2 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Pro's and Con's
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 was launched more recently (Q4 2017) compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core (Q2 2015). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.8 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1206, the Intel Pentium Silver J5005 outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core (score: 1163). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has a higher base clock speed of 2.7 GHz compared to the Intel Pentium Silver J5005's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has a higher CPU Mark score of 35.79 compared to the Intel Pentium Silver J5005's 5.95. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core scores 2250, which is lower than the Intel Pentium Silver J5005's score of 3105. This makes the Intel Pentium Silver J5005 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Pentium Silver J5005's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
